2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical hydro-geotechnical model for marine gravity structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, this study obtainedẇ i (velocity of pore water) (20) from (2) (seepage equilibrium equation) and combine it with (3) (Mass continuous equation), thus all the gradient terms are separated out (see the underlined for k and E) in the governing Equations (21)- (27). Equations (20) and (27) are newly proposed in this study. Comparing to the previous studies, this study provide a approach to separate out all the gradient terms in the 3D dynamic response equations of the elastic porous seabed medium.…”
Section: Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that, this study obtainedẇ i (velocity of pore water) (20) from (2) (seepage equilibrium equation) and combine it with (3) (Mass continuous equation), thus all the gradient terms are separated out (see the underlined for k and E) in the governing Equations (21)- (27). Equations (20) and (27) are newly proposed in this study. Comparing to the previous studies, this study provide a approach to separate out all the gradient terms in the 3D dynamic response equations of the elastic porous seabed medium.…”
Section: Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Liao et al [14] and Tong et al [15] considered the effect of currents on the wave-induced seabed response, and Chen et al [16] studied the nonlinear wave-induced response of an anisotropic seabed. Similar studies have been conducted to investigate the seabed response around marine structures, such as pipelines [17], composite breakwaters [18][19][20][21][22], and mono-piles [23,24]. All these studies have assumed a homogeneous seabed that adopts constant soil parameters in space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weller et al [18] and Jasak and Weller [28] implementations form a component of the opensource C++ library OpenFOAM (formerly commercial software FOAM). Many of the subsequent Submitted for review (0000) THIRTY YEARS OF THE FINITE VOLUME METHOD FOR SOLID MECHANICS 9 developments in the implicit cell-centred field have been based on the OpenFOAM platform, for example, [77,78,88,94,98,104,115,118,119,121,142,466]. It should, however, be noted that the standard cell-centred form of the finite volume method is not the only approach that has built on the OpenFOAM library; Godunov-type methods, for example, have been implemented by Haider et al [370,372]; these are discussed later.…”
Section: "Standard" Cell-centred Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quasi-static anisotropic poro-elastic solver by Tang et al (2014) was validated and applied in the work of Li et al (2018) in which the anisotropic consideration was proved to be practical for modeling the seabed of medium and coarse sand. Elsafti and Oumeraci (2016) developed a hydro-geotechnical solver named geotechFoam to model the soil-structure interaction around the marine gravity structures, including a multi-yield surface plasticity model to simulate plastic soil response under cyclic loads. The soil constitutive model for simulating plastic deformations and two-dimensional wave loading on the elastic seabed without a structure has been validated in their work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%