2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical investigation of matrix-free implicit time-stepping methods for large CFD simulations

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the development and testing of advanced time-stepping methods suited for the integration of time-accurate, real-world applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The performance of several time discretization methods is studied numerically with regards to computational efficiency, order of accuracy, and stability, as well as the ability to treat effectively stiff problems. We consider matrix-free implementations, a popular approach for time-stepping methods applied to large… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of full-matrix operators was still required for preconditioning purposes, and thus only a limited reduction of the overall memory footprint has been achieved. In [8] a matrix-free approach is employed in the context of several time integration strategies with applications to unsteady, laminar two-dimensional problems. Recently the use of a matrix-free implementation was explored and compared to a matrix-based approach in the context of incompressible unsteady turbulent flows, see [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of full-matrix operators was still required for preconditioning purposes, and thus only a limited reduction of the overall memory footprint has been achieved. In [8] a matrix-free approach is employed in the context of several time integration strategies with applications to unsteady, laminar two-dimensional problems. Recently the use of a matrix-free implementation was explored and compared to a matrix-based approach in the context of incompressible unsteady turbulent flows, see [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall Eqs. (10), (12) and (13), in order to calculate the common inviscid and viscous fluxes, information from neighbor elements will be needed. Therefore, in the procedure of calculating R i,m and with the complex-step derivative approximation, adding a disturbance to the corresponding entry in q j will be done n dof times.…”
Section: Details On the Parallel Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linearly implicit Rosenbrock methods avoid solving nonlinear systems every stage in some IRK methods, such as singly diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods (SDIRK) [12], and solve only one linear system at each stage [13]. Different variations of Rosenbrocktype IRK methods can be found in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that the third-order ROW methods tested are more efficient than ESDIRK3. Sarshar et al [46] conducted a comparative study of various matrix-free implicit time-stepping methods on solving two-dimensional (2D) Navier-Stokes equations including SDIRK, Rosenbrock, ROW, and ROK using a secondorder spatial discretization. It is found that ROK can be a competitive method compared to other implicit time integrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%