A Numerical Investigation on Soot Formation From Laminar Diffusion Flames of Ethylene/Methane Mixture

Abstract

The sooting propensity of laminar diffusion flames employing ethylene/methane mixture fuel is investigated by numerical simulation. Detailed gas phase chemistry and moments method are used to describe the chemical reaction process and soot particle dynamics, respectively. The numerical model captures the primary features experimentally observed previously. At constant temperatures of air and fuel mixture, both maximum soot volume fraction and soot yield monotonically decrease with increasing the fraction of carbon from methane in the fuel mixture. However, when the temperatures of air and fuel mixture are preheated so that the adiabatic temperatures of all flames are same, the variation of the maximum soot yield becomes higher than what would be expected from a linear combination of the flames of pure ethylene and pure methane, showing a synergistic phenomenon in soot formation. Further analysis of the details of the numerical results suggests that the synergistic phenomenon is caused by the combined effects of the variations in the concentrations of acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) and methyl radical (CH 3 ). When the fraction of carbon from methane in fuel mixture increases, the concentration of C 2 H 2 monotonically decreases, whereas that of methyl radical increases, resulting in a synergistic phenomenon in the variation of propargyl (C 3 H 3 ) radical concentration due to the reactions C 2 H 2 + CH 3 = PC 3 H 4 + H and PC 3 H 4 + H = C 3 H 3 + H 2 . This synergistic phenomenon causes a qualitatively similar variation trend in the concentration of pyrene (A4) owing to the reaction paths C 3 H 3 → A1 (benzene) → A2 (naphthalene) → A3 (phenanthrene) → A4. Consequently, the synergistic effect occurs for soot inception and PAH condensation rates, leading to the synergistic phenomenon in soot yield. The similar synergistic phenomenon is not observed in the variation of peak soot volume fraction, since the maximum surface growth rate monotonically decreases, as the fraction of carbon from methane in fuel mixture increases.

The chemical effects of CO2 addition to methane on aromatic chemistry

“…The peak concentration of A 1 was shown to be sensitive to the reactions CH 3 + C 2 H 2 ⇋ H + PC 3 H 4 , CH 3 + PC 3 H 4 → CH 4 + C 3 H 3 , PC 3 H 4 → H + C 3 H 3 , H + PC 3 H 4 → H 2 + C 3 H 3 , H + C 3 H 3 → H 2 + C 3 H 2 , and AC 3 H 4 ⇋ PC 3 H 4 . Such a trend has been identified in various other studies[43,[63][64][65][66].Unlike these works, the self-recombination of propargyl C 3 H 3 +C 3 H 3 → A 1 was found to be considerably less important than C 3 H 3 + PC 3 H 4 → H + A 1 . The direct chemical action of carbon dioxide manifests itself through the reaction H + CO 2 ⇋ OH + CO which, in both directions, plays a remarkable role in the CH 4 (25%) -CO 2 (75%) mixture, whereas its influence on benzene concentration is very small in the absence of CO 2 among the reactants.…”

Numerical Prediction of Radiation and Air Preheating Effects on the Soot Formation in a Confined Laminar Co-Flow Diffusion Flame

“…time basis [23]. Mathematically, it can be written on percentage basis as sv s c 2 rvρ f dr Y 100 ( 22) m…”

“…time basis [23]. Mathematically, it can be written on percentage basis as The calculated values of total soot, soot number and soot yield for four flames considered in this work have been presented in table 2.…”