2007
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/23/6/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for a Cauchy problem for elliptic partial differential equations

Abstract: The Cauchy problem for an elliptic partial differential equation is ill-posed. In this paper, we study a numerical method for solving the Cauchy problem. The numerical method is based on a reformulation of the Cauchy problem through an optimal control approach coupled with a regularization term which is included to treat the severe ill-conditioning of the corresponding discretized formulation. We prove convergence of the numerical method and present theoretical results for the limiting behaviors of the numeric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, problem (8)-(9) may not admit a solution, and if solution exists it may be not unique. However, we can show the following two theorems about the solution of the control problem which are similar to the results in [24]. Theorem 2.2.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, problem (8)-(9) may not admit a solution, and if solution exists it may be not unique. However, we can show the following two theorems about the solution of the control problem which are similar to the results in [24]. Theorem 2.2.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…They also proved that problem (4)-(6) is equivalent to the original problem (1) under some regularity assumptions on the data, and thus the ill-posedness of the original problem is inherited. Subsequently, Han et al [24] improved the result of [12] by introducing a regularization term to deal with the ill-posedness, which minimizes…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When α goes to zero, the error will blow up. But, it is well known that the penalty parameter α is vary small in many applications, such as the regularization process of some ill‐posed problems (see e.g., ). In this case, the error estimate in Theorem is not valid.…”
Section: The a Priori Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are based on standard Galerkin formulations, but rely on structured meshes or a special form of the continuous problem for stability [15,24,25]. Some use the above mentioned regularization techniques to ensure stability [3,4,6,7,13] a related approach is to recast the problem as a minimization problem [11,18,17], possibly with regularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%