1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02666735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for predicting intermetallic layer thickness developed during the formation of solder joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[18,19] We will show that for a stoichiometric intermetallic phase, reaction leads to a linear growth behavior, d / t. For mixed modes of diffusion and reaction, the growth factor is between 1/2 and 1. This finding is contrary to the existing relation, [20,21] d / t n , n 1/2. (ii) Secondly, the existing works explain the formation of the sandwich-like structure by nucleation and grain growth theories.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…[18,19] We will show that for a stoichiometric intermetallic phase, reaction leads to a linear growth behavior, d / t. For mixed modes of diffusion and reaction, the growth factor is between 1/2 and 1. This finding is contrary to the existing relation, [20,21] d / t n , n 1/2. (ii) Secondly, the existing works explain the formation of the sandwich-like structure by nucleation and grain growth theories.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Time exponents of the growth curve measured with eutectic Sn-Pb solder on a Cu pad, however, were significantly different from the theoretical values, ranging from 0.21 to 0.37. [1][2][3][4][5] These results indicate that neither the volumetric diffusion through the layer nor the reaction at the interface is the rate-controlling step of the intermetallic layer formation reaction. In addition, the wide variation in time-exponent values might be an indication of varying rate-controlling steps depending on the conditions of reflow soldering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Typical soldering of copper consists of (i) eutectic melting (reflow) of solder bump and (ii) reaction of molten solder with substrate leading to formation and growth of one or two intermetallics, g-Cu 6 Sn 5 phase and e-Cu 3 Sn phase [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Mechanical bonding is provided mainly by g-phase, which has peculiar morphology-scallops of individual grains separated by some boundaries, nature of which is still under discussion-liquid channels of molten solder [8,9,11], prewetted grain boundaries [12], ordinary grain boundaries [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%