1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.1993.tb00314.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A NUMERICAL METHOD FOR SIMULATING HEAT TRANSFER IN HETEROGENEOUS and IRREGULARLY SHAPED FOODSTUFFS1

Abstract: Heat conduction during cooking of foodstuffs with heterogeneous thermal properties was simulated, mainly for irregularly shaped geometries. A code employing boundary-fitted grids was implemented in a numerically conservative form (control volume formulation). This technique consists of finding a numerical coordinate transformation which fits a regular grid to the domain of integration. With the grid as data, coefficients for a transformed differential equation are then obtained.The proposed model was experimen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With this intention, Manson, Stumbo, and Zahradnik (1974) used a finite difference model to predict the temperatures in conduction heating of pear-shaped objects, and Simpson, Aris, and Torres (1989) applied a finite difference approximation to the differential equation for transient heat conduction in three dimensions to evaluate thermal processing of foods in oval-shaped containers. The method of finite difference has been used by other researchers to simulate heat conduction in irregularly shaped foods (Califano & Zaritzky, 1993;Sheen, Tong, Fu, & Lund, 1993;Akterian & Fikiin, 1994;Kim & Teixeira, 1997). More recently, Erdogdu, Balaban, and Chau (2003) reported results using a volume element based approach to finite difference model for heat transfer in elliptical cross sections by using power curves; an important contribution of this work was the use of different boundary conditions at the surface and non-homogeneous thermo physical properties inside the food.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With this intention, Manson, Stumbo, and Zahradnik (1974) used a finite difference model to predict the temperatures in conduction heating of pear-shaped objects, and Simpson, Aris, and Torres (1989) applied a finite difference approximation to the differential equation for transient heat conduction in three dimensions to evaluate thermal processing of foods in oval-shaped containers. The method of finite difference has been used by other researchers to simulate heat conduction in irregularly shaped foods (Califano & Zaritzky, 1993;Sheen, Tong, Fu, & Lund, 1993;Akterian & Fikiin, 1994;Kim & Teixeira, 1997). More recently, Erdogdu, Balaban, and Chau (2003) reported results using a volume element based approach to finite difference model for heat transfer in elliptical cross sections by using power curves; an important contribution of this work was the use of different boundary conditions at the surface and non-homogeneous thermo physical properties inside the food.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the transition to a more universal reference frame allows orthogonal grids that are either uniform or nonuniform in one or both directions to be constructed for more complex domains in physical space (21). An algebraic analog of Eqn [3] was obtained by application of the control-volume formulation and an explicit discretization scheme with respect to time (20). The calculation domain was divided into a number of nonoverlapping discrete control volumes such that there is one control volume surrounding each grid point.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, boundaryfitted grids were generated by solving Laplace's equations for the fitted coordinates, namely (20):…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons may arise in complexity for correctly describing the true shape, solving the problem by appropriate numerical methods and computational requirements for simulating processes. Heating or cooling (Gustafson et al, 1979), cooking (Califano and Zaritzky, 1993), freezing and thawing (Califano and Zaritzky, 1997), deep-fat frying (Ngadi et al, 1997) and drying (Neményi et al, 2000) were simulated using 2D irregular geometries for different food materials. Considering 3D geometries, thermal processing (Sastry et al, 1985) and cooking (Purlis and Salvadori, 2005; were also studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%