2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for static or dynamic stiffness matrix of non-uniform members resting on variable elastic foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The element has three degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the nodal x and y directions and rotation about the nodal z-axis. The obtained result of stability analysis of case c is compared with the buckling load evaluated by matrices solution proposed by Girgin and Girgin [27] whereas, in the case of tapered column, the linear buckling load acquired by present method is verified with results obtained by numerical method proposed by Soltani et al [28]. The relative errors ( (%)  ) between the results of present study and the abovementioned methods are also calculated.…”
Section: -1 Examplesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The element has three degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the nodal x and y directions and rotation about the nodal z-axis. The obtained result of stability analysis of case c is compared with the buckling load evaluated by matrices solution proposed by Girgin and Girgin [27] whereas, in the case of tapered column, the linear buckling load acquired by present method is verified with results obtained by numerical method proposed by Soltani et al [28]. The relative errors ( (%)  ) between the results of present study and the abovementioned methods are also calculated.…”
Section: -1 Examplesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The element has three degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the nodal x and y directions and rotation about the nodal z-axis. The obtained result of stability analysis of case c is compared with the buckling load evaluated by matrices solution proposed by Girgin and Girgin [27] whereas, in the case of tapered column, the linear buckling load acquired by present method is verified with results obtained by numerical method proposed by Soltani et al [28]. The relative errors ( (%) …”
Section: -1 Examplesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Wang et al (2005) presented a paper for comprehensive review of state-of-art on the analysis of beams and plates resting on elastic foundations considering the interaction of between structure and supporting soil media. Z. C. Girgin and K. Girgin (2005) represented the numerical method focusing non-uniform beam-columns on resting on variable one-or two-parameter elastic foundations or supported by no foundation; a variable iterative algorithm is developed for computer application of the method. Z. C. Girgin and K. Girgin (2006) proposed a generalized numerical method for non-uniform Timoshenko beam-columns subjected to several effects through a unified approach based on the Mohr method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%