2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical model for reinforced concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tendency was captured by a numerical simulation. We note that we were not able to capture this failure mechanism in earlier studies in a 2D-setting [45]. We also were able to capture load-deflection curves.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This tendency was captured by a numerical simulation. We note that we were not able to capture this failure mechanism in earlier studies in a 2D-setting [45]. We also were able to capture load-deflection curves.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Then, the crack orientation is fixed. Other interesting contributions can be found, for example, in [17,[61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Smeared Crack Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some models combine the rotating and fixed smeared crack approach [61]. Up to a certain crack opening, the crack is allowed to rotate.…”
Section: Smeared Crack Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since only one particle is used over the thickness, fracture occurs over the entire thickness. The Rankine criterion is used to detect the onset of fracture [46][47][48][49][50][51][52] although more-complex criteria, such as loss of stability, might be studied in the future [53,54]. We do not use cohesive-zone models after a discrete crack is introduced which will be a subject for future study as well.…”
Section: Constitutive Model and Fracture Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%