2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical model of twin disc test arrangement for the evaluation of railway wheel wear prediction methods

Abstract: Twin disc tests are commonly used to study wear in railway materials. In this work the implementation of a numerical model of the twin disc arrangement is given, which reproduces the distribution of tangential forces over the contact patch between the two discs. Wear is subsequently calculated by relating the forces and creepage between the two discs using three different wear functions found in the literature. The resulting wear rates are compared with experimental data for discs made of common railway wheel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It consists of using the commercial multibody software VAMPIRE [18], which is used to study the dynamics of the railway vehicles, integrated with a purpose-built wear computation module that is used to predict the wear of railway steel wheels [6,8,10,19].…”
Section: Description Of the Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It consists of using the commercial multibody software VAMPIRE [18], which is used to study the dynamics of the railway vehicles, integrated with a purpose-built wear computation module that is used to predict the wear of railway steel wheels [6,8,10,19].…”
Section: Description Of the Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear computational module is a purpose-built code [6,8,10,19]. That is used to manage the pre-and postprocessing dynamic analysis data in order to compute the wheel profiles wear for a given railway system.…”
Section: Description Of the Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations