2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical solver for a nonlinear Fokker–Planck equation representation of neuronal network dynamics

Abstract: Abstract. To describe the collective behavior of large ensembles of neurons in neuronal network, a kinetic theory description was developed in [13,12], where a macroscopic representation of the network dynamics was directly derived from the microscopic dynamics of individual neurons, which are modeled by conductance-based, linear, integrate-and-fire point neurons. A diffusion approximation then led to a nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation for the probability density function of neuronal membrane potentials and sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
65
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analytical and numerical results contribute to support the NNLIF system as an appropriate model to describe well known neurophysiological phenomena, as for example synchronization/asynchronization of the network, since the blow-up in finite time might depict a synchronization of a part of the network, while the presence of a unique asymptotically stable stationary solution represents an asynchronization of the network. In addition, the abundance in the number of steady states, in terms of the connectivity parameter values, that can be observed for this simplified model, probably will help us to characterize situations of multi-stability for more complete NNLIF models and also other models including conductance variables as in [6]. In [7] it was shown that if a refractory period is included in the model, there are situations of multi-stability, with two stable and one unstable steady state.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analytical and numerical results contribute to support the NNLIF system as an appropriate model to describe well known neurophysiological phenomena, as for example synchronization/asynchronization of the network, since the blow-up in finite time might depict a synchronization of a part of the network, while the presence of a unique asymptotically stable stationary solution represents an asynchronization of the network. In addition, the abundance in the number of steady states, in terms of the connectivity parameter values, that can be observed for this simplified model, probably will help us to characterize situations of multi-stability for more complete NNLIF models and also other models including conductance variables as in [6]. In [7] it was shown that if a refractory period is included in the model, there are situations of multi-stability, with two stable and one unstable steady state.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other PDE models describing the spiking neurons, which are related to the Fokker-Planck system considered in the present work, are based on Fokker-Planck equations including conductance variables, [26,6,25] (and references therein) and on the time elapsed models [22,23,24]. In [15] the authors study the connection between the Fokker-Planck and the elapsed models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was also used in [20] for a computational neuroscience model with variable voltage and conductance. In order to use this method, the first step is to rewrite the Fokker-Planck equation (1.4) in terms of the Maxwellian Mfalse(vfalse)=e(vbN)22afalse(Nfalse) as follows, …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation presented here is equivalent and more suitable for mathematical treatment. Other more complicated microscopic models including the conductance and leading to kinetic-like Fokker-Planck equations have been studied recently, see [4] and the references therein. Finally, the nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation can be rewritten as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%