1982
DOI: 10.1086/160541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study of the effects of ambipolar diffusion on the collapse of magnetic gas clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism was originated [57] to explain jets generated near black holes. This mechanism was originated [57] to explain jets generated near black holes.…”
Section: Winds and Outflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism was originated [57] to explain jets generated near black holes. This mechanism was originated [57] to explain jets generated near black holes.…”
Section: Winds and Outflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the magnetic field becomes too weak, it is overwhelmed by self-gravity, and the cloud begins a dynamic contraction to form a star. The process of magnetic leakage during cloud contraction has been extensively investigated both analytically (e.g., Mestel & Spitzer 1956;Nakano & Tademaru 1972) and numerically (e.g., Nakano 1979;Black & Scott 1982;Lizano & Shu 1989;Ciolek & Mouschovias 1993;Basu & Mouschovias 1994;Li 1999;Mouschovias & Ciolek 1999). Specific models based on this scenario appear able to explain the observations of wellstudied dense cores B1 and L1544 (Crutcher et al 1994;Ciolek & Basu 2000;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the magnetic Ðeld is often simply characterized by a critical mass that M crit depends on the magnetic Ñux threading the cloud (Mestel & Spitzer 1956 ;Mouschovias & Spitzer 1976 ;Shu, Adams, & Lizano 1987 ;Tomisaka, Ikeuchi, & Nakamura 1988 ;McKee et al 1993 ;Mestel 1999). Clouds with M [ M crit are termed supercritical and collapse on a dynamical timescale : the magnetic Ðeld can have a moderate e †ect on the morphology of collapse and can slow collapse in the cloud envelope (e.g., Black & Scott 1982), but cannot signiÐcantly slow collapse in the core. Clouds with are termed M \ M crit subcritical and evolve on a longer timescale as magnetic support is lost as a result of ambipolar di †usion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%