2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study on combustion characteristics of blended methane-hydrogen bluff-body stabilized swirl diffusion flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At x/d = 1.4, the axial velocity is between −0.0281 m/s and −0.119 m/s in r/d ∈(0, 0.04), indicating that the incipient part of SRZ can be captured, whereas the numerical values remain a little over-predicted and the dimensions of SRZ are understated. Kashir et al 29 suggested that the calculation errors in RANS could be attributed to an inherent shortcoming in simulation of shear flow. Meanwhile, a good prediction of the calculated values for the RANS model has been recorded in the region away from the shear flow, where the average relative error does not exceed 11% compared with experimental measurements (10.853%, 4.312%, 3.408%, and 10.586% for x/d = 0.136, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.4 in 0.55 < r/d < 0.8 zones, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At x/d = 1.4, the axial velocity is between −0.0281 m/s and −0.119 m/s in r/d ∈(0, 0.04), indicating that the incipient part of SRZ can be captured, whereas the numerical values remain a little over-predicted and the dimensions of SRZ are understated. Kashir et al 29 suggested that the calculation errors in RANS could be attributed to an inherent shortcoming in simulation of shear flow. Meanwhile, a good prediction of the calculated values for the RANS model has been recorded in the region away from the shear flow, where the average relative error does not exceed 11% compared with experimental measurements (10.853%, 4.312%, 3.408%, and 10.586% for x/d = 0.136, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.4 in 0.55 < r/d < 0.8 zones, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable fuel and swirl air stream to be fully developed through the tube, these inlets are shifted 50 mm upstream; such an approach has been applied in Yang et al’s and Kashir et al’s previous work. 27 , 29 …”
Section: Computational Domain and Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since current studied flame structure has an hourglass shape in higher swirl numbers (s g =0.6), the furthermost point of stoichiometric mixture fraction is not always on the centerline. In this regard, the flame length is defined as the highest axial distance between the fuel exit plane (bluff-body surface) and the place where the mixture fraction reaches to its stoichiometric ratio [41].…”
Section: Dilution Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy to mention that the selection of an appropriate turbulence model plays a major role in the simulation of swirling flames. Some researchers focus on the numerical methods with reasonable calculation time and cost that are able to capture the main characteristics of flow fields along with the distribution of major and minor species [40,41,42,43,44,45]. In this regard, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models have shown acceptable levels of accuracy in the prediction of main flow features, and their results for mean values are comparable with more complicated turbulence models like Large Eddy Simulation (LES) [46].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%