2020
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study on multi‐site damage identification: A data‐driven method via constrained independent component analysis

Abstract: Summary This paper presents a solution to the multi‐site structural damage identification problem using a data‐driven method and constrained independent component analysis (cICA). While existing studies in this field presented encouraging results for single‐site damage identification, limited research effort has been devoted to identifying multi‐site damage due its complexity. Efficient features for single‐site damage identification may lose their effectiveness when multi‐site damage occurs. This paper extract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regression models [28], blind source separation techniques [29], the Mahalanobis squared distance [30,31], principal component analysis (PCA), and factor analysis have been implemented to treat environmental and operational effects [32]. Extensive works on damage identification, modeling approaches, and EOF treatment may be found in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression models [28], blind source separation techniques [29], the Mahalanobis squared distance [30,31], principal component analysis (PCA), and factor analysis have been implemented to treat environmental and operational effects [32]. Extensive works on damage identification, modeling approaches, and EOF treatment may be found in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Thanks to the recent progress in machine learning techniques, they have been frequently employed on SHM data of bridges. [21][22][23][24] The state-of-the-art algorithms include artificial neural networks (ANNs), 25,26 independent component analysis, 27 cluster analysis, 28,29 support vector machines (SVMs), 30,31 transfer learning, 32 and ensemble learning methods, 33 which have been proved to be accurate and efficient. Particularly, Lu et al 34 developed a stochastic fatigue truck-load model for investigating fatigue reliability of welded steel bridge decks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHM is mainly classified into two categories: data-driven methods based on statistical pattern recognition and physics-based methods based on finite element model updating [4]. Compared with physics-based methods building a numerical model, data-driven methods have many advantages over physics-based methods while identifying structural damage under load and environmental influence such as temperature and moisture effect [5]. Thus, many researchers have focused on data-driven methods for structural damage detection to protect the safety of civil structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%