2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study on the axial crushing response of hybrid pultruded and ±45° braided tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 45-degree chamfer is modeled as a single row of reduced thickness 0.25 mm elements at the crush front of the specimen. The card * PART_COMPOSITE is used to define the 16 layers of composite sinusoidal specimen, and the finite element model is adopted the material model of MAT 54_Enhanced_Composite_Damage, which used the Chang-Chang failure criterion in the LS-DYNA theoretical manual (Han, 2007;LSTC, 2012). The material card of MAT 54 contains input parameters for both material physical properties of T700/3234 (Table 1) and other code-specific parameters (Table 2) ( Paolo, 2011;LSTC, 2012).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 45-degree chamfer is modeled as a single row of reduced thickness 0.25 mm elements at the crush front of the specimen. The card * PART_COMPOSITE is used to define the 16 layers of composite sinusoidal specimen, and the finite element model is adopted the material model of MAT 54_Enhanced_Composite_Damage, which used the Chang-Chang failure criterion in the LS-DYNA theoretical manual (Han, 2007;LSTC, 2012). The material card of MAT 54 contains input parameters for both material physical properties of T700/3234 (Table 1) and other code-specific parameters (Table 2) ( Paolo, 2011;LSTC, 2012).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it was decided to continue with the shell elements. Normally the triggering type 1 is modelled with shell elements with gradually reduced thickness [10,21] as shown in Figure 3 geometry of the composite tube; rather it would yield a double chamfering triggering geometry. To study the effect of triggering modelling, in addition to the Model A, one more possible modelling (Model B) was adopted where the shell elements are located as shown in Figure 3(b).…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few quasi-static and impact numerical simulations [10,31] have been conducted for the triggering type 1 using shell elements. To get the initial peak crushing force the accurate numerical modelling of triggering is very important.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations