A Nurse-Led Web-Based Home Asthma Education Program for Children and their Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ng, Juliet S.K.; Chau, Janita Pak Chun; Chan, Angus C.W.; Lui, Jacky K.C.; Cheng, James W C H

doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2021.04.014

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Three additional full texts are retrieved by going through references of retrieved full texts during primary screening. After final screening against eligibility criteria, the final consensus was reached by including 14 studies (Figure 1) (Chen & Chen, 2021; Cicutto et al, 2013; Gao et al, 2020; Harrington et al, 2018; Horner et al, 2016; Kamps, 2003; Kuethe et al, 2011; Lv et al, 2019; Madge et al, 1997; Ng et al, 2021; Persaud et al, 1996; van Bragt et al, 2015; Wesseldine et al, 1999; Xu et al, 2010).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of nursing interventions for management of children with bronchial asthma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Tao

Fan²,

Hariharan

et al. 2023

Int J of Nursing Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimNursing interventions include the preventive care that can support and guide the nurse's effort to provide asthma interventions for children. Hence, this review was done to assess the effectiveness of nursing interventions for management of childhood asthma.MethodsWe conducted a search in Medline, the Cochrane library, EMBASE, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar from 1964 until April 2022. Meta‐analysis was done using a random‐effects model and pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and/or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsFourteen studies were analysed. The pooled RR was 0.49 for emergency visits (95% CI: 0.32 to 0.77) and 0.46 for hospitalizations (95% CI: 0.27 to 0.79). The pooled WMD was −1.20 for number of days with symptoms (95% CI: −3.50 to 1.11), −0.98 for number of nights with symptoms (95% CI: −2.94 to 0.98) and −0.69 for frequency of asthma attacks (95% CI: −1.19 to −0.20). The pooled SMD was 0.39 for quality of life (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.66) and 0.58 for asthma control (95% CI: −0.29 to 1.46).ConclusionNursing interventions were relatively effective in improving the quality of life and reducing asthma related emergencies, acute attacks and hospitalization amongst childhood asthma patients.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of nursing interventions for management of children with bronchial asthma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Tao

Fan²,

Hariharan

et al. 2023

Int J of Nursing Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The randomization technique and variation from targeted interventions were determined to be low risk in all of the investigations. Three studies ( 7 , 15 – 16 ) showed a significant probability of missing outcome data, measuring outcome, and selectively presenting results relative to the other areas. Five out ( 3 , 13 – 14 , 17 – 18 ) of the 9 studies (more than half) had some concerns or an overall low risk of bias.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impact of nurse intervention on asthmatic children’s control status has been documented in two trials ( 14 , 16 ) in total. The pooled SMD was 1.25 (95%CI: −0.77 to 3.28; I 2 =98.1%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Community-Based Nursing Intervention for Asthmatic Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu,

2023

ijph

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Preventive care can support and direct the nurse's efforts to deliver an asthma intervention for children as part of nursing interventions. Despite the significance, there have been few meta studies demonstrating the effectiveness of nursing interventions for the treatment of childhood asthma that includes only randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, this meta study was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of nursing care interventions for the management of childhood asthma. Methods: STATA 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used to conduct the meta-analysis. From 1964 to July 2022, we searched Medline, the Cochrane library, EMBASE, Scopus Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Depending on the type of outcome, a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, pooled weight mean difference (WMD), standardised mean difference (SMD), and/or risk ratio (RR) with stated 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs). PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducing this study. Results: Nine studies were analysed in total. The pooled RR for emergency visits was 0.49 (95%CI: 0.32 to 0.77), for hospitalizations was 0.64 (95%CI: 0.21 to 1.89). The pooled SMD for frequency of asthma attacks was -2.88 (95%CI: -3.22 to -2.54), quality of life was 0.49 (95%CI: 0.22 to 0.75) and asthma control was 1.25 (95%CI: -0.77 to 3.28). Conclusion: Paediatric asthma patients who received nursing interventions reported an improved quality of life and a decrease in emergencies and acute attacks due to asthma. Future RCTs should focus on uncovering the short- and long-term effects of these nursing interventions to provide optimal management and care.

show abstract

“…Parents shared concepts, strategies, and attitudes among themselves, family members, friends, teachers, and day-care providers [ 30 ]. The results of this scoping review indicate other benefits of parenting programmes, such as the better utilisation of child health care resources [ 19 ] and a reduction in unplanned consultations and readmissions [ 40 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parenting Programme Structure, Potential Barriers, and Facilitators: A Scoping Review

Ramos

Matos

Soares

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Becoming a parent is a challenging transition, and stress factors may arise. This scoping review aims to map, from the literature, the structure, potential barriers, and facilitators to be considered when conducting a parenting programme for parents of children up to 3 years old. It followed the JBI methodology and included studies with parents of children up to 3 years old (Participants), studies about parenting programme structure, its potential barriers, and facilitators (Concept) in the healthcare or community setting (Context). Qualitative and/or quantitative study designs and grey literature publications between 2016 and 2021 were eligible. The search was performed in three stages in CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE with Full Text, and PubMed databases. It was also conducted in OpenGrey, ProQuest, Portuguese Open Access Scientific Repository, and Google Scholar. Fourteen articles were selected. The following aspects were identified regarding parenting programmes: benefits; structuring elements to be considered; facilitating factors and possible barriers to its development, and measurement instruments to assess the programme. Parenting programmes are important ways to contribute to a healthy, sustainable, and resilient society. It should be adapted to individuals, groups, and communities. They add value to parents, children, and society and should be carefully adapted to the group’s needs.

show abstract

A Nurse-Led Web-Based Home Asthma Education Program for Children and their Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 7 publications

References 18 publications

Effectiveness of nursing interventions for management of children with bronchial asthma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Effectiveness of nursing interventions for management of children with bronchial asthma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Effectiveness of Community-Based Nursing Intervention for Asthmatic Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Parenting Programme Structure, Potential Barriers, and Facilitators: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About