2022
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A one-dimensional model for the pulsating flow of cerebrospinal fluid in the spinal canal

Abstract: The monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) fluctuations, which is needed in the context of a number of neurological diseases, requires the insertion of pressure sensors, an invasive procedure with considerable risk factors. Intracranial pressure fluctuations drive the wave-like pulsatile motion of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) along the compliant spinal canal. Systematically derived simplified models relating the ICP fluctuations with the resulting CSF flow rate can be useful in enabling indirect evaluations of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2019; Sincomb et al. 2022). To enable quantitative predictions, these future investigations should consider more realistic geometrical configurations, including annular models of the spinal canal with obstacles arranged longitudinally to represent the ventral and dorsal nerve roots (Stockman 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2019; Sincomb et al. 2022). To enable quantitative predictions, these future investigations should consider more realistic geometrical configurations, including annular models of the spinal canal with obstacles arranged longitudinally to represent the ventral and dorsal nerve roots (Stockman 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019; Sincomb et al. 2022), the flow rate exhibits a non-sinusoidal variation induced by the intracranial pressure, including a short period of fast caudal flow followed by a longer period of slow flow in the cranial direction. Since this pulsating stream interacts with nerve roots and ligaments that are aligned with the flow, a relevant question is whether such interactions can lead to the appearance of a longitudinal streaming motion, which could explain the enhanced transport rate previously observed (Stockman 2006, 2007).…”
Section: Steady Streaming In Anharmonically Oscillating Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the large subject-to-subject variations in observed respiratory-driven flow, comparisons between cardiac-and respiratorydriven flow should be conducted on a subject-to-subject basis. As an example, subjects 1 and 2 in Sincomb et al, 31 respectively, correspond to subjects 5 and 2 of the present study. For these subjects, the ratios between respiratory-and cardiac-driven peak flow rates were, respectively, 0.1 and 0.3 at C2/C3, 0.2 and 0.4 at T6/T7, and 0.7 and 1.3 at L1 and L2, where both peak values become comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Respiratory-driven spinal CSF flow occurs in addition to that driven by the cardiac cycle. 9,[29][30][31] Induced by intracranial pressure fluctuations, the cardiac-driven flow presents a different spatial variation of flow rate and stroke volume along the spine (eg, Figs 2 and 3 in Sincomb et al 31 ) with maximum values in the upper cervical region, decreasing monotonically toward the closed caudal end. Given the large subject-to-subject variations in observed respiratory-driven flow, comparisons between cardiac-and respiratorydriven flow should be conducted on a subject-to-subject basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) and Sincomb et al. (2022)). The back-and-forth motion of CSF has a typical stroke length , and a characteristic velocity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%