1996
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(96)00016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A P/Wirtanen evolution model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Water ice does not sublimate beyond 6 AU and CO and/or CO 2 must probably be invoked to explain such an activity at large heliocentric distances (Capria et al 1996). CO has indeed been marginally detected in June 1995 when Chiron was at 8.50 AU from the Sun by Womack & Stern (1997) who derived a production rate of 1.5 ± 0.8 × 10 28 s −1 .…”
Section: Visible Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Water ice does not sublimate beyond 6 AU and CO and/or CO 2 must probably be invoked to explain such an activity at large heliocentric distances (Capria et al 1996). CO has indeed been marginally detected in June 1995 when Chiron was at 8.50 AU from the Sun by Womack & Stern (1997) who derived a production rate of 1.5 ± 0.8 × 10 28 s −1 .…”
Section: Visible Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1987 to 1990 interval, when Chiron was beyond 11 AU from the Sun, a large brightening was observed which is not yet very well understood. At such a heliocentric distance, the activity is believed to be dominated by the sublimation of CO (Capria et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might also introduce potentially large errors in the determination of the temperature distribution. We compared our results with a 1D model (Capria et al 1996) to evaluate the error made with the stratification assumption. For objects like TNOs, it has been found to be negligible (temperature differences less than 1%).…”
Section: Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models of Capria et al (1996) and de Sanctis et al (1999) give a water production rate too low compared with the observations, althougth they assumed a 100% active surface. The models of Möhlmann (1999) and Benkhoff (1999) both made approximations when they calculate Q H 2 O : Möhlmann (1999) assumed an arbitrary active fraction of 50% of the illuminated hemisphere while Benkhoff (1999) calculated the water production rate at the sub-solar point, without taking into account the lower insolation at higher latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%