2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A packetization strategy for interactive multiview video streaming over lossy networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Baseline 1, view synthesis is adopted at the server but is not adopted at each user [4]. In Baseline 2, view synthesis is adopted at each user but is not adopted at the server [9]. Note that natural multicast opportunities can be utilized by both baseline schemes; Baseline 1 cannot create multicast opportunities based on view synthesis, but can ensure that no more than K views are transmitted; Baseline 2 can create multicast opportunities based on view synthesis, but may transmit more than K views.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Baseline 1, view synthesis is adopted at the server but is not adopted at each user [4]. In Baseline 2, view synthesis is adopted at each user but is not adopted at the server [9]. Note that natural multicast opportunities can be utilized by both baseline schemes; Baseline 1 cannot create multicast opportunities based on view synthesis, but can ensure that no more than K views are transmitted; Baseline 2 can create multicast opportunities based on view synthesis, but may transmit more than K views.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exit stream is a slow‐moving video; the objects2 is an intermediate‐moving stream, and the ballroom stream is a fast‐moving sequence. The compressed bit streams of the tested 3D sequences are firstly obtained by utilizing the suggested error resilience methods at the encoder side, and then transported over a wireless network with various PLRs of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, which are simulated using the Gilbert channel model . The Gilbert‐Elliott model has been applied in the proposed wireless transmission channel model for packet error process based on the 2‐state Markov model.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressed bit streams of the tested 3D sequences are firstly obtained by utilizing the suggested error resilience methods at the encoder side, and then transported over a wireless network with various PLRs of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, which are simulated using the Gilbert channel model. 35 The Gilbert-Elliott model has been applied in the proposed wireless transmission channel model for packet error process based on the 2-state Markov model. Further discussion details, equations, conditions, assumptions, and parameters for the used wireless network packet loss model are found in Hohlfeld.…”
Section: The Proposed Multihypothesis Error Concealment Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18]- [21], the authors consider a wireless MVV transmission system with a single server [18]- [20] or multiple servers [21] and multiple users, where channel fading and broadcast nature of wireless communications are captured. The transmission mechanisms in [18]- [21] make use of natural multicast opportunities to reduce energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%