T he splicing factor SUP-12 from C. elegans, in combination with either ASD-1 or FOX-1 from the Fox-1 (RBFOX) family, is required for generating a muscle-specific isoform of the fibroblast growth factor receptor EGL-15. Biophysical techniques have revealed the sequence preference for the RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domain from SUP-12 as well as the structural details of the RNA-bound complex. Detailed genetics have identified a requisite need for the presence of both SUP-12 and ASD-1/FOX-1 to regulate the alternative splicing event, prompting speculation of a cooperative mechanism between these proteins on binding RNA. In contrast, the interplay between SUP-12 and ASD-1 suggests that although the RRM domains from each protein are in direct contact on the egl-15 pre-mRNA, there is no simple contribution of binding cooperativity. Evidence for an independent binding mechanism by SUP-12 and ASD-1 will be discussed, including a model in which both positive and negative contributions are balanced during complex assembly. The ability to monitor tissue-specific alternative splicing in live nematodes will continue to provide a powerful method to test in vivo mechanistic models derived from atomic-level investigation.Interactions between cellular biomolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids are critical for life, and the precise regulation of these interactions in a time-and location-dependent manner allows for normal organism development.Alternative splicing can contribute to this process through the production of development-and tissuespecific protein isoforms. The spliceosome generally interacts with target premRNA with the help of constitutive protein trans factors that recognize RNA cis elements in order to define the intron boundaries and dictate the series of exons in the mature mRNA. To regulate this process, additional splicing factors also bind to the pre-mRNA in order to enhance or inhibit specific 5 0 and 3 0 intron splice sites. The mechanisms by which the final splice patterns are established are in general poorly understood, but predominantly involve cooperative or competitive interactions with the constitutive splicing machinery to alter spliceosome recruitment, premRNA motif availability or the catalytic efficiency.Several splicing factors have already been identified in C. elegans that display limited expression patterns and lead to cell type-specific changes in splicing regulation.1 In many cases, multiple factors are linked to a specific splicing event, including both positive and negative regulators that together dictate the final pattern of exon retention in the mature mRNA.
2Structures of RNA-binding domains from splicing proteins shed light on the basis for RNA motif preference and this information can explain the phenotypic effects of known genetic variations in the protein factors or RNA elements. The molecular details also help in the strategic design of mutants to selectively perturb the contribution of a splicing factor in a given splicing event. Less known are the atomic details that under...