2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A palaeomagnetic study of the lower part of the Palaeoproterozoic Waterberg Group, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maré et al (2006) also observed this pervasive lightning signature among their sites within the same intrusion. Anomalously high coercivities revealed during demagnetization and the randomly scattered nature of directions point to lightning strikes as the possible cause of the poor quality of the results.…”
Section: Alma Formation Abp (Purple Shale and Dolerite)mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Maré et al (2006) also observed this pervasive lightning signature among their sites within the same intrusion. Anomalously high coercivities revealed during demagnetization and the randomly scattered nature of directions point to lightning strikes as the possible cause of the poor quality of the results.…”
Section: Alma Formation Abp (Purple Shale and Dolerite)mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…When steep, it is parallel to the present geomagnetic field at the sampling localities, but Hanson et al (2004a) attributed this direction to remagnetization during the Umkondo igneous event at ~1.1 Ga. Note that the INT direction cannot be distinguished from the direction obtained by Maré et al (2006) from red beds of the Swaershoek and Wilgeriver Formations, and that those authors rightly interpreted it as being a magnetic overprint. The paleomagnetic pole for the INT component is straddled by the poles of the Pilanesberg dykes (Gough, 1956) and that of the Premier kimberlite cluster (Doppelhammer and Hargraves, 1994) and 1244 ± 30 Ma (Onstott et al, 1986) Namaqua Eastern Zone combined pole (Evans et al, 2002).…”
Section: Mean Paleomagnetic Directions and Interpretation Of Remanencmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…commun. ; also Maré et al 2006). A thick spherule layer in southern Greenland of about 1.8-2.0 Ga age was tentatively linked with either the Vredefort impact or with the Sudbury event (Chadwick et al 2001).…”
Section: Stratigraphic Impact Evidencementioning
confidence: 87%