A Paradoxical Relationship? Regionalization and Canadian National Identity

Abstract

Regionalization tendencies have often been regarded, in academic and political debates, as a serious challenge for Canadian federalism and the national unity of Canada. This article argues that regionalism-and increased regionalization processes in the context of neoliberal globalization tendencies-is not a contradictory force that threatens federalism and national unity, but that it is and has historically been a decisive feature of Canadian civic nationalism from the beginning of the nation-building project. As a consequence, and for better or worse, processes of devolution under the current politico-economic regime will stabilize Canadian national unity rather than undermine it: regionalization can strengthen civic nationalism in Canada by adding a cultural dimension as a vehicle that negotiates between individual citizens, identity groups, and state institutions. Regionalisms-such as Québécois nationalism-are malleable structures of belonging and provide institutional frameworks (e.g., informal constitutions) and forums of dialogue that enrich the political culture of federalism. We conclude that increased regionalization can help to strengthen Canadian (and other forms of) civic nationalism by preventing them from slipping into monistic unitarism.

Using a Boundary Object Perspective to Reconsider the Meaning of STEM in a Canadian Context

“…This was an important moment of nation building in Canadian politics, culminating in 1982 with the repatriation of the constitution and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Questions of what it means to be Canadian, to learn and grow as a Canadian citizen were ubiquitous in policy and political discourse (though a myriad of more complicated social issues including Indigenous rights, emerging regionalism, and Francophone autonomy were often downplayed; Vormann & Lammert, 2014). Within this climate, the Science Council process emerged principally out of the Commission on Canadian Studies.…”