2015
DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parallel Computing Framework for Finding the Supported Solutions to a Biobjective Network Optimization Problem

Abstract: Solving multi‐objective combinatorial optimization problems can quickly become computationally challenging when applied to large networks generated from big data. Present‐day first‐rate Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) solvers have parallelism built‐in to take advantage of multicore architectures; but specialized network optimization algorithms that can often solve graph problems more efficiently than a general MIP solver are typically programmed serially. Thus, these network algorithm implementations do not ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Objective (9) reflects that (1 − w )o 2 is subtracted from wo 1 since objective (4) has a minimization orientation. A potential issue to consider for integer programming models is that the weighting method may not be able to identify all Pareto tradeoffs [see Medrano and Church 2015]. Accordingly, the constraint method represents a potential alternative for finding the Pareto tradeoffs [ReVelle 1993;Wei and Murray 2018].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Objective (9) reflects that (1 − w )o 2 is subtracted from wo 1 since objective (4) has a minimization orientation. A potential issue to consider for integer programming models is that the weighting method may not be able to identify all Pareto tradeoffs [see Medrano and Church 2015]. Accordingly, the constraint method represents a potential alternative for finding the Pareto tradeoffs [ReVelle 1993;Wei and Murray 2018].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, multiple objective modeling very much reflects such a planning and decision-making approach. ReVelle [1993], Medrano and Church [2015], and Wei and Murray [2018] highlight both the challenges and utility of multiple objective considerations. [ Setti et al 2020], individuals should maintain at least 9 feet of distance between others and remain in their assigned office with doors closed, only going to the restroom or lounge when necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis implemented the parallel bi-objective shortest path algorithm described in Medrano and Church [ 49 ] to compute the complete set of supported (convex) non-dominated path solutions using an origin at the lower-left corner of the raster region, and a destination at the top-right corner. This algorithm, called pNISE is a parallel implementation of the NISE algorithm commonly used to find the supported solutions of biobjective network optimization problems [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their empirical evaluation demonstrates significant speedups, building upon the seemingly impractical work by Sanders and Mandow (2013). Medrano and Church (2015) propose another parallel approach for computing the set of extreme solutions in the biobjective setting, showing applicability using personal machines and shared memory supercomputers. Ahmadi et al (2021) suggest a bi-objective bi-directional search algorithm where one search runs from the source and another from the target.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%