International Workshop on Gravity, Electrical &Amp; Magnetic Methods and Their Applications, Beijing, China, October 10–13, 201 2011
DOI: 10.1190/1.3659052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parallel finite‐element method for 3‐D marine controlled‐source electromagnetic forward modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6.4 Tests for Insensitivity to the Maximal Size Ratio Between the Grid Elements Finite-element grids normally have extremely large size ratios between the elements due to local refinements. This is usually a reason for the poor convergence of a solver (Koldan et al, 2011). Having this in mind, we have performed tests to see if our preconditioning scheme can reduce the sensitivity of an iterative solver to a big size difference between the biggest to the smallest element in a mesh.…”
Section: Flat Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.4 Tests for Insensitivity to the Maximal Size Ratio Between the Grid Elements Finite-element grids normally have extremely large size ratios between the elements due to local refinements. This is usually a reason for the poor convergence of a solver (Koldan et al, 2011). Having this in mind, we have performed tests to see if our preconditioning scheme can reduce the sensitivity of an iterative solver to a big size difference between the biggest to the smallest element in a mesh.…”
Section: Flat Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE grids normally have extremely large size ratios between the elements due to local refinements. This is usually a reason for the poor convergence of a solver (Koldan et al, 2011). Having this in mind, I have performed tests to see if this preconditioning scheme can reduce the sensitivity of an iterative solver to a big size difference between the biggest to the smallest element in a mesh.…”
Section: Tests For Insensitivity To the Maximal Size Ratio Between Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%