2011
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parametric Empirical Bayesian Framework for the EEG/MEG Inverse Problem: Generative Models for Multi-Subject and Multi-Modal Integration

Abstract: We review recent methodological developments within a parametric empirical Bayesian (PEB) framework for reconstructing intracranial sources of extracranial electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data under linear Gaussian assumptions. The PEB framework offers a natural way to integrate multiple constraints (spatial priors) on this inverse problem, such as those derived from different modalities (e.g., from functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI) or from multiple replications (e.g.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
124
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scheme is implemented within the parametric empirical Bayes framework of SPM8 (73)(74)(75). This approach allows the use of multiple priors, in the form of source covariance matrices, which constrain the resulting source solutions and are optimized by maximizing the negative free-energy approximation to the model evidence (76).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scheme is implemented within the parametric empirical Bayes framework of SPM8 (73)(74)(75). This approach allows the use of multiple priors, in the form of source covariance matrices, which constrain the resulting source solutions and are optimized by maximizing the negative free-energy approximation to the model evidence (76).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method produces smooth solutions similar to those obtained by the LORETA method (77), which are appropriate for assessing activation overlap across participants. Multimodal fusions of the data were achieved by using a heuristic to convert all sensor data to a common scale and by weighting additional error covariance matrices for each sensor type to maximize the model evidence (72,75). Such an approach allows the noise levels associated with each sensor type to be estimated directly from the data; by maximizing the negative free energy, sensor types with high estimated levels of noise contribute less to the resulting source solutions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source localization procedure is contingent on a single regularization parameter: the prior sparsity level. Sparsity is a common assumption, employed in estimating ill-posed inverse solutions, and widely applied in EEG imaging [12,39,28,42]. In EEG, the sparsity assumption is motivated by the apparently sparse focal nature of brain activation [16].…”
Section: Forward Model Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We apply the EEG recordings and structural MRI data from 16 healthy subjects (F=7, M=9, age=23-31 years) from the multimodal dataset acquired by R. Henson and D. Wakeman [39,40]. Functional MRI (fMRI) and MEG were also recorded but not applied in this study.…”
Section: Neuroimaging Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these components may embody different types of informative priors, e.g., different smoothing functions, medical knowledge, fMRI priors (Henson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Multiple Sparse Priors Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%