2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.05.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parametric GP model dealing with incomplete information for group decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A (parametric) linear combination of the sum and the maximum is proposed by Jones and Mardle [24] to find a compromise weight vector. A similar idea is applied in the proposal of Dopazo and Ruiz-Tagle [14], developed for group decision problems with incomplete pairwise comparison matrices.…”
Section: Weighting As a Multiple Objective Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A (parametric) linear combination of the sum and the maximum is proposed by Jones and Mardle [24] to find a compromise weight vector. A similar idea is applied in the proposal of Dopazo and Ruiz-Tagle [14], developed for group decision problems with incomplete pairwise comparison matrices.…”
Section: Weighting As a Multiple Objective Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [4] deal with this problem by means of similarity and parametric compromise functions. In [15], a fitness function is defined as a scalar vector function composed of the common error measure, based on the Euclidean distance, and a minimum violation error that accounts for no violation of the rank ordering is considered to improve deriving of the weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are based on Saaty's assumption for MPR regarding the exact functional relation between the preference values and the priority vector. Two main approaches are used to develop indirect completion models based on the computation of the priority vector: linear based methods where the unknown variables are the elements of the weighting vector [23,35,81,83,88,94], and least square error minimization approaches [30,48,78,88].…”
Section: Optimisation and Linear Programming Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimisation approaches to estimate the missing preference values or to directly rank the alternatives without previously completing the preference relations. Therefore there are two types of these approaches: 2.1 Methods that estimate the missing preferences [25,102], and 2.2 Methods that estimate the weighting vector [23,30,35,48,78,81,83,88,88,94].…”
Section: Decision Making Approaches With Incomplete Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%