Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland, 30 Nov.-1 Dec. 2016 2016
DOI: 10.15221/16.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parametric Model of Shoulder Articulation for Virtual Assessment of Space Suit Fit

Abstract: Suboptimal suit fit is a known risk factor for crewmember shoulder injury. Suit fit assessment is however prohibitively time consuming and cannot be generalized across wide variations of body shapes and poses. In this work, we have developed a new design tool based on the statistical analysis of body-shape scans. This tool is aimed at predicting the skin deformation and shape variations for any body size and shoulder pose for a target population. This new process, when incorporated with CAD software, will enab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For context, if all possible prediction error was accumulated to only affect length and width, it would be higher than the half-size step of the American shoe sizing system (Luximon and Luximon, 2013), but less than inter-brand variability of shoe length and shoe width (Wannop et al, 2019). Further, this error is lower than the RMSEs of other parametric SSMs that predicted static standing child body shape (mean=10.4mm) , dynamic shoulder deformation (mean=11.98mm) (Kim et al, 2016) and child torso shape (mean=9.5mm) (Park et al, 2017). Note though, that the presented model may have lower prediction errors due to the foot being a relatively smaller section of the body to model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For context, if all possible prediction error was accumulated to only affect length and width, it would be higher than the half-size step of the American shoe sizing system (Luximon and Luximon, 2013), but less than inter-brand variability of shoe length and shoe width (Wannop et al, 2019). Further, this error is lower than the RMSEs of other parametric SSMs that predicted static standing child body shape (mean=10.4mm) , dynamic shoulder deformation (mean=11.98mm) (Kim et al, 2016) and child torso shape (mean=9.5mm) (Park et al, 2017). Note though, that the presented model may have lower prediction errors due to the foot being a relatively smaller section of the body to model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…First scans were roughly aligned using a point-to-plane iterative-closest-point algorithm (Chen and Medioni, 1992), implemented in Open3D . Next, the radial-basis function fitting algorithm from the GIAS2 software package was run twice using a thin-plate spline to approximate the foot surface Kim et al, 2016). The mid-stance scan from each subject was registered first to the template, and then the registration process was run both forwards towards toe-off and backwards towards heel-strike, on a scan-by-scan basis, using the previously registered scan as a template for the next scan.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made for developing morphologic and kinematic human and spacesuit models to predictively assess spacesuit fit and mobility (Kim et al, 2016(Kim et al, , 2019Davis et al, 2020). This framework for virtual testing of spacesuit fit is based on 3D body scanning and computational modeling techniques.…”
Section: D Virtual Fit Assessment and Modeling 301mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made for developing morphologic and kinematic human and spacesuit models to predictively assess spacesuit fit and mobility (Kim et al. , 2016, 2019; Davis et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las dimensiones corporales en posturas forzadas o en movimiento son importantes en el diseño e innovación de prendas que requieren un ajuste funcional óptimo, caso particular de la indumentaria deportiva (Naglic et al, 2016) (Figura 35) o los equipos de protección individual (K. H. Kim et al, 2016;Loercher et al, 2018). Los últimos avances de la mano de escáneres 4D, han permitido analizar cómo evoluciona una medida corporal con ciertos movimientos (Uriel et al, 2022).…”
Section: Antropometría Digital 3dunclassified