2008
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/35/7/075006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parametrization of the baryon octet and decuplet masses

Abstract: We construct a general parametrization of the baryon octet and decuplet mass operators including the three-body terms using the unit operator and the symmetrybreaking factors M d = diag (0, 1, 0) and M s = diag (0, 0, 1) in conjunction with the spin operators. Our parametrization has the minimal number of operators needed to describe all the octet and decuplet masses. Investigating the likely size of the three-body terms, we find that contributions of the three-body hypercharge splittings are comparable to tho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among research, a fundamental question is to identify accurate threshold to construct reliable stock networks. Recent work suggested statistical text method to find the solution [33,34,35,36,37], but this methodology usually doesn't account for multiple hypothesis testing corrections [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among research, a fundamental question is to identify accurate threshold to construct reliable stock networks. Recent work suggested statistical text method to find the solution [33,34,35,36,37], but this methodology usually doesn't account for multiple hypothesis testing corrections [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…967.41 938.27 [51] 1239.94 1192.64 [51] 1.0 931.08 866.00 [52] 1203.29 1022.00[52] 1.5 924.27 938.27 [1] 1195.98 1192. 64[1] 0.5 ddu(n) 1067.24 939.00 [11] The computed magnetic moments of the octet and decuplet baryons are compared with the known experimental results as well as with other model predictions in Table 3 and 4 respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%