2006
DOI: 10.1177/1359104506059135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parent-report Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children: A Cross-national, Cross-clinic Comparative Analysis

Abstract: A one-factor, 14-item parent-report Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children (GIQC) was developed in a sample of 325 clinic-referred children with gender identity problems and 504 controls from Toronto, Canada (Johnson et al., 2004). In this study, we report a cross-national, cross-clinic comparative analysis of the GIQC on gender-referred children (N = 338) from Toronto and gender-referred children (N = 175) from Utrecht, The Netherlands. Across clinics, the results showed both similarities and differences.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There was, however, clear evidence that the subthreshold group was ''gender nonconforming'' in that the effect size between their mean score and that of the controls was substantial (Cohen's d ranged from 1.44 to 3.28 when blocked by age groups [e.g., 3-5 years, 5-6 years, etc.]). In a sample of gender-referred children from Utrecht, Cohen-Kettenis et al (2006) also found that the threshold cases (n = 114) had a significantly more deviant score on the GIQC than did the subthreshold cases (n = 42).…”
Section: Threshold Versus Subthreshold Comparative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was, however, clear evidence that the subthreshold group was ''gender nonconforming'' in that the effect size between their mean score and that of the controls was substantial (Cohen's d ranged from 1.44 to 3.28 when blocked by age groups [e.g., 3-5 years, 5-6 years, etc.]). In a sample of gender-referred children from Utrecht, Cohen-Kettenis et al (2006) also found that the threshold cases (n = 114) had a significantly more deviant score on the GIQC than did the subthreshold cases (n = 42).…”
Section: Threshold Versus Subthreshold Comparative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…There have been at least seven such studies in the DSM-IV era (Chiu et al, 2006;Cohen-Kettenis, Owen, Kaijser, Bradley, & Zucker, 2003;Cohen-Kettenis et al, 2006;Fridell, OwenAnderson, Johnson, Bradley, & Zucker, 2006;Johnson et al, 2004;Wallien, Veenstra, Kreukels, & Cohen-Kettenis, 2009;). In some of these studies, data on specificity and sensitivity have been examined.…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gender identity was assessed using a 12-item Childhood Gender Identity Questionnaire (CGIQ; Johnson et al, 2004) that characterizes male-typical and female-typical behavior. CGIQ has been used previously when interviewing parents about their child's behavior (Johnson et al, 2004;Cohen-Kettenis et al, 2006) and has also been used to measure childhood-gendered behavior retrospectively from adulthood (Bartlett & Vasey, 1996;VanderLaan, Gothreau, Bartlett, & Vasey, 2011;VanderLaan, Petterson, & Vasey, 2015). In CGIQ, questions range from how the child prefers to play at home, the kind of games they play, and the toys they prefer, to whether they prefer male or female company.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es existieren Fragebögen, die systematisch die genannten Punkte erfragen, insbesondere der von der holländischen Arbeitsgruppe entwickelte Utrechter "gender identity questionnaire" [1]. Für den deutschen Sprachraum entwickelt werden gegenwärtig ein Interessen-und ein Eigenschaftswahlverfahren für geschlechtsidentitätsgestörte Patienten, die regelmäßig bei den in der Frankfurter Universitätsklinik vorgestellten geschlechtsidentitätsgestörten Kindern und Jugendlichen verwandt werden.…”
Section: Testpsychologie/fragebögenunclassified