2018
DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1534543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parent–science partnership to improve postsurgical pain management in young children: Co-development and usability testing of the Achy Penguin smartphone-based app

Abstract: (2018) A parent-science partnership to improve postsurgical pain management in young children: Co-development and usability testing of the Achy Penguin smartphone-based app,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the parents reported that PDMP using MIM was very helpful because they were able to resolve any concerns and inquiries with their nurses at any time. This result is in line with that of previous studies that provide information via MIM or smartphone app have a positive impact on parents by providing easy-tounderstand information, reducing state anxiety and improving pain management and that it is an effective way of promoting caregivers' participation (Birnie et al, 2018;Newton & Sulman, 2018). On the basis of these findings, it would be necessary to expand the use of MIM and examine its efficacy as a means of communication between medical professionals, including nurses, and parents to facilitate children's recovery at home after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, the parents reported that PDMP using MIM was very helpful because they were able to resolve any concerns and inquiries with their nurses at any time. This result is in line with that of previous studies that provide information via MIM or smartphone app have a positive impact on parents by providing easy-tounderstand information, reducing state anxiety and improving pain management and that it is an effective way of promoting caregivers' participation (Birnie et al, 2018;Newton & Sulman, 2018). On the basis of these findings, it would be necessary to expand the use of MIM and examine its efficacy as a means of communication between medical professionals, including nurses, and parents to facilitate children's recovery at home after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The intervention group showed a significantly greater increase in knowledge about postdischarge management than the control group. This may be because the information and interaction provided via a smartphone application, such as MIM were repeatedly and easily accessible to the parents, enabling iterative learning, and as Birnie et al () suggested, MIM served as a platform for bidirectional communication between nurses and parents when necessary. These results are similar to previous findings that provide surgery‐related information increasing recipient's knowledge (He et al, ; Yang et al, ; Zhu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 , 66 To ensure that mHealth interventions for chronic pain meet end-user needs and are effectively translated into clinical practice, it will be critical to continue to include end-users (e.g., physicians, nurses, patients, family members) throughout the phases of development and evaluation. 58 By engaging pain psychology experts, apps will be more likely to align with current best practice guidelines and evidence-based psychological approaches for treating chronic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, most manuscripts did not report on the measurement of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction, because they fail to use a combination of methods that allows assessing these three domains [27]. Only eight out of the 31 manuscripts included [19,29,32,37,38,[54][55][56] assessed all the three domains of usability, despite existing recommendations to include measures of efficiency, effectiveness, and user satisfaction since a narrower selection of usability measures may lead to unreliable conclusions about the overall usability of the app [64]. Furthermore, there was an inconsistency between what was reported in the methodology section and the results presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 23 studies, five also targeted specific age groups: four used children or adolescents [32,33,49,51] and one used older individuals [29]. From the remaining manuscripts (n = 8), two used children and adolescents [54,55] for usability assessment, four used individuals from the general population [35,39,56,57] and another two used health professionals [58,59]. The overview of the manuscripts analyzed is presented in the Table S1 from the Supplementary file.…”
Section: Usability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%