2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parsimonious parametric model for generating margin requirements for futures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goldman and Shen (2020) construct a three-regime threshold autoregressive model, to achieve trade-off between risk sensitivity and APC, allowing for estimation for a ceiling, floor, and speed limit. Alexander et al (2019) develop a parametric model for futures margin based on median tail loss of futures distribution, with an objective to maintain stability and reduce procyclicality, while being risk-sensitive. Murphy and Vause (2021), Murphy, Vasios, and Vause (2016) develop a framework for measuring the costs and benefits of different approaches to mitigate procyclicality and perform a comparative analysis of tools to limit procyclicality in terms of variability of the IM requirements.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldman and Shen (2020) construct a three-regime threshold autoregressive model, to achieve trade-off between risk sensitivity and APC, allowing for estimation for a ceiling, floor, and speed limit. Alexander et al (2019) develop a parametric model for futures margin based on median tail loss of futures distribution, with an objective to maintain stability and reduce procyclicality, while being risk-sensitive. Murphy and Vause (2021), Murphy, Vasios, and Vause (2016) develop a framework for measuring the costs and benefits of different approaches to mitigate procyclicality and perform a comparative analysis of tools to limit procyclicality in terms of variability of the IM requirements.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, although the SPAN system applied to the existing electricity futures market takes into account the short term-rapid-extreme price changes in futures contracts and the risks associated with delivery defaults, such risks are usually deliberately underestimated in the actual implementation due to the extremely small probability of these two changes occurring [19]. However, for green power futures, the probability of the occurrence of the aforementioned risks arising from weather and low power factor will substantially increase, especially the delivery defaults [20,21]. Therefore, the existing SPAN-based margin calculation method does not apply to the green power futures market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Futures contracts are commonly used to hedge spot price risk. We refer this rich field to Figlewski (1984), Daskalaki and Skiadopoulos (2016) and Alexander et al (2019) for traditional equity, commodity and currency markets. For bitcoin futures markets, the hedge effectiveness and improvement of portfolio performance are well studied in Alexander et al (2020a), Sebastião and Godinho (2020), Deng et al (2019) and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%