A Participatory Approach to Ecosystem Conservation: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Stakeholder Group Analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey

Abstract

Fuzzy cognitive mapping was used to develop a participatory ecosystem management plan for Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Interviews were conducted with stakeholders belonging to six different groups. Lake pollution was the most central and most mentioned variable for stakeholders. Stakeholder groups agree that lake pollution is negatively affecting ecosystem health and thereby local economies. Thus, reducing lake pollution was chosen as the overall goal for the management plan. Possible ways to reduce lake pollution and increase ecosystem health were seen differently by the different groups. Hunters, factory managers, NGO personnel, and local people thought industry was the main cause of lake pollution, while officials from the government and local municipalities thought roads and urban development contributed the most to lake pollution. Generally the stakeholder groups did not perceive their own actions as affecting the lake as strongly as other groups thought. For example, factory managers viewed factory pollution as negatively affecting the lake but less strongly than the other groups did. According to policy option simulations, reducing lake pollution had positive effects on all variables, especially fish, birds, animal husbandry, irrigation, agriculture, and the ecological balance of the lake. Results of this analysis were used to facilitate meetings among stakeholder groups and to develop a participatory ecosystem management plan. The analysis was useful for pointing out the similarities as well as the differences among the groups. It also helped the facilitators understand the focus of each stakeholder group and enabled them to suggest activities in which each group would want to participate.

A Participatory Approach for Adapting River Basins to Climate Change

“…FCMs have been applied in previous water management studies to gain a shared understanding of the dynamics of their study object or to assess impacts of (few) management options [21,45,46], but it has, to our knowledge, not been combined before with a multi-criteria analysis. The combination of these methods, however, was a valuable step to evaluate the impacts of 102 options in total, taking into account the stakeholder preferences in the evaluation of the options.…”

Collaborative problem structuring using MARVEL

“…As a result, the output behaviour is not related to time (e.g., relations force the value of a goal variable towards that of a fraction of the starting variable but do not do so in the context of a specified time period). This makes the result hard to compare to real world behaviour, limiting the practical use of FCMs (Carvalho and Tomè 2001;Ö zesmi and Ö zesmi 2003;Kok 2009). We may conclude that simulation of an FCM and MARVEL are similar to a certain degree.…”

Using fuzzy cognitive mapping techniques to model situation awareness for army infantry platoon leaders

“…In recent research, FCM has both been applied in collecting and presenting expert's knowledge (Skov and Svenning 2003;Tan and Özesmi 2006), and for collecting and comparing knowledge from experts and from laypeople (Giles et al 2007). FCM has been applied in working with different stakeholder groups (Özesmi and Özesmi 2003;Skogoey and Skov 2007) and in cases where the focus has been nature conservation and landscape management (Isak 2008;Khan and Quaddos 2004). Also, FCMs have been used in domains (e.g., medical; Taber 1991; distributed networks; Ndousse and Okuda 1996; and health care; Smith and Eloff 2000), knowledge mapping instruments (Özesmi 1999;Özesmi 2003, 2004;Hobbs et al 2002;Banini and Bearman 1998;and Gettings et al 2004) and decision support systems (Siraj et al 2001;Geogropoulous et al 2003;Xirogiannis et al 2004).…”