2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-9255(02)00098-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A participatory approach to social impact assessment: the interactive community forum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
56
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Esteves et al (2012) identified a set of issues that persist in SIA, including inadequate public participation and analyses that do not identify spatial or temporal distributions of impacts. Research has demonstrated that dialogue-based approaches to SIA such as interactive community forums and participatory modeling can help to overcome these limitations by providing a more comprehensive and deeper understanding of values, place meanings, and perceived impacts (Becker et al 2003, Harris et al 2012, Whitfield and Reed 2012. Rather than predicting impacts from secondary data sources, an emerging paradigm of SIA seeks a community-based process that empowers affected people with improved understanding of a project and increased capacity to negotiate outcomes with the project managers or developers (Vanclay and Esteves 2011).…”
Section: When Federal Actions Aimed At Species Conservation In the Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Esteves et al (2012) identified a set of issues that persist in SIA, including inadequate public participation and analyses that do not identify spatial or temporal distributions of impacts. Research has demonstrated that dialogue-based approaches to SIA such as interactive community forums and participatory modeling can help to overcome these limitations by providing a more comprehensive and deeper understanding of values, place meanings, and perceived impacts (Becker et al 2003, Harris et al 2012, Whitfield and Reed 2012. Rather than predicting impacts from secondary data sources, an emerging paradigm of SIA seeks a community-based process that empowers affected people with improved understanding of a project and increased capacity to negotiate outcomes with the project managers or developers (Vanclay and Esteves 2011).…”
Section: When Federal Actions Aimed At Species Conservation In the Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our conceptual framework builds on previous work (i.e., Slootweg et al 2001, de Groot et al 2002, Vanclay 2002 by merging ecosystem service concepts with social process concepts to represent better the role of humans and the interdependent relationships between humans and ecosystems. The methodological approach directly engages diverse stakeholders and builds on previous work (i.e., Becker et al 2003, Gunderson and Watson 2007, Whitfield et al 2011, Harris et al 2012, Whitfield and Reed 2012, Lowery and Morse 2013 by deliberating project alternatives to identify stakeholders' perceptions of potential impacts, and by adding a spatial dimension with participatory mapping to include place meanings and values across the landscape.…”
Section: When Federal Actions Aimed At Species Conservation In the Unmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous but unrelated to these efforts in academia, philanthropic foundations have also started to develop new ways for identifying the impact of the work they are sponsoring in order to better understand the social return on their investments and their compliance with their missions and mandates (details on that below) (Barrett & Leddy, 2008;John & James, 2011;Knight Foundation, 2011). Consequently, foundations increasingly require their grantees to provide impact assessment reports at the end of their funding periods -a trend that has not yet been picked up on by science funding bodies, though such a move is at least imaginable in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, foundations increasingly require their grantees to provide impact assessment reports at the end of their funding periods -a trend that has not yet been picked up on by science funding bodies, though such a move is at least imaginable in the future. Some foundations have published guidelines for impact assessment (Barrett & Leddy, 2008;Clark & Abrash, 2011;Ford Foundation;Green & Patel, 2013), others have released sample case studies (Britdoc). In contrast to academia, foundations conceptualize impact as positive change, or as moving the needle on some social justice issue (Ford Foundation;Green & Patel, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation