2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings 2012
DOI: 10.1109/i2mtc.2012.6229413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A particle filtering approach for joint vehicular detection and tracking in lidar data

Abstract: This paper presents a method for joint detection and tracking of vehicles in scanning laser range data. Many methods use a solution that processes the raw data in a detection procedure and then tracks the detected object in an association/tracking procedure. The proposed approach uses a preclustering stage (SIP) as an input of the tracking process that allows to manage the displacement of the center-of-gravity and the changes in the apparent shape from object and motion modeling. The global problem is then des… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of tracking point has a great impact on the tracking result of moving obstacle. When using HDL-64E LiDAR to track the moving obstacle, point-cloud data combined with the prior shape knowledge of the moving obstacle can deduce the moving obstacle's center position, 20,21 but in fact, the shapes of all the moving obstacles do not strictly meet the specific models, and because of the obstacle's occlusion and self-occlusion, the deduced center position cannot represent the vehicle's position precisely. We improve Xiao et al's method, 22 and when the moving obstacle is in different regions, different optimum tracking point is selected, and when the moving obstacle switches from a region to another region, the length and width of the moving obstacle are taken into account.…”
Section: Moving Obstacle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selection of tracking point has a great impact on the tracking result of moving obstacle. When using HDL-64E LiDAR to track the moving obstacle, point-cloud data combined with the prior shape knowledge of the moving obstacle can deduce the moving obstacle's center position, 20,21 but in fact, the shapes of all the moving obstacles do not strictly meet the specific models, and because of the obstacle's occlusion and self-occlusion, the deduced center position cannot represent the vehicle's position precisely. We improve Xiao et al's method, 22 and when the moving obstacle is in different regions, different optimum tracking point is selected, and when the moving obstacle switches from a region to another region, the length and width of the moving obstacle are taken into account.…”
Section: Moving Obstacle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal estimationX kþ1 at time k þ 1 can be obtained through equation (21), where K kþ1 is the Kalman gain which can be obtained through equation ( 22) at time k þ 1, and Z kþ1 is the actual observation of moving obstacle at time k þ 1.…”
Section: Moving Obstacle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First detection results have been presented in [10] and the gain is shown regarding conventional detection approaches (Split-and-Merge, Incremental, Ransac), which are generally based on a Cartesian modeling. Here, we propose a modelbased approach on this framework which avoids the detection step [22]. As a consequence, the modeling of the filtering problem must be rewritten by using the aggregated data.…”
Section: Lidar Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the SIP detector [22] is used to initialize the filter according to one of the prior defined object classes (trucks, large size car, small size car).…”
Section: The Ip-smc Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation