2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-013-9795-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Partition of Unity Method with Penalty for Fourth Order Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative is to employ generalized finite element methods [28,2]. This was carried out in [9] using a flat-top partition of unity method (PUM) from [21,30,29,14]. Below we recall some basic facts concerning the PUM in [9].…”
Section: A Partition Of Unity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to employ generalized finite element methods [28,2]. This was carried out in [9] using a flat-top partition of unity method (PUM) from [21,30,29,14]. Below we recall some basic facts concerning the PUM in [9].…”
Section: A Partition Of Unity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spurious solutions may occur in some situations. The conforming finite element methods including Argyris elements [2] and the partition of unity finite elements [11], require globally continuously differentiable finite element spaces, which are difficult to construct and implement. The third type of approaches use non-conforming finite element methods, such as Adini elements [1], Morley elements [19,21,25] and the ordinary C 0 -interior penalty Galerkin method [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the existing studies were concerned with the second-order elliptic eigenvalue problems and there are relatively few works treating the biharmonic eigenvalue problems. In recent years, the numerical methods of eigenvalue problems were mainly based on finite element methods which include conforming finite elements [3,11,20,25], nonconforming finite elements [1,18,21,23], and mixed finite elements [5,10,17,19]. For the conforming finite element method, it requires globally continuously differentiable finite element spaces, which are difficult to construct and implement (in particular for three dimensional problems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%