2011
DOI: 10.4103/2231-0738.84211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pathomorphological study of the sublethal toxicity of cypermethrin in Sprague Dawley rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An apparent hyperplasia of epithelial lining of some bronchioles could be seen. Similar findings of lung damage during CYP toxicity have been reported earlier in rats where varying degrees of pulmonary congestion, haemorrhage, edema and focal areas of emphysema were observed in lung tissues (Nair et al, 2011). This could be attributed to the accumulation of ROS in the lung because of increased lipid peroxidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…An apparent hyperplasia of epithelial lining of some bronchioles could be seen. Similar findings of lung damage during CYP toxicity have been reported earlier in rats where varying degrees of pulmonary congestion, haemorrhage, edema and focal areas of emphysema were observed in lung tissues (Nair et al, 2011). This could be attributed to the accumulation of ROS in the lung because of increased lipid peroxidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, these animals are exposed to cypermethrin residues contained in ingested feed. Many studies have shown the chronic toxicity of cypermethrin in some mammals (Nair et al, 2011;Bhushan et al, 2013;EL-Shemi et al, 2015). Nevertheless, to our knowledge, studies showing effects of cypermethrin on the reproduction of farm animals are very scarce, though many of them are necessary to better appreciate the reproductive toxicity of this insecticide used worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In group 4, mild (+) parenchymal degeneration was observed. (5,27,28). Group 3 had less weight gain among the groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%