2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436860.47774.eb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Patient-Centered Appraisal of Outcomes following Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Abstract: Therapeutic, III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 Three of the systematic reviews compared anterior with endoscopic anterior components separation, a fourth one compared different techniques of components separation (2-part study), the fifth study assessed different surgical methods of giant hernia repair including hernioplasty and components separation, and the sixth paper investigated the quality of life following open hernia repair including satisfaction from component separation technique. [20][21][22][23][24][25] The 3 retrospective studies comparing posterior components separation with other techniques that met the inclusion criteria are Krpata et al, Cobb et al, and Holihan et al 23,26,27 The different characteristics of these are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Three of the systematic reviews compared anterior with endoscopic anterior components separation, a fourth one compared different techniques of components separation (2-part study), the fifth study assessed different surgical methods of giant hernia repair including hernioplasty and components separation, and the sixth paper investigated the quality of life following open hernia repair including satisfaction from component separation technique. [20][21][22][23][24][25] The 3 retrospective studies comparing posterior components separation with other techniques that met the inclusion criteria are Krpata et al, Cobb et al, and Holihan et al 23,26,27 The different characteristics of these are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accurately identify a given species, DNA barcoding using the cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 gene is recommended ( Siddall et al, 2007a ). Although leech species differ in salivary protein ( Baskova et al, 2008 ; Siddall et al, 2011 ) and gut microbiota composition ( Graf, 1999 ; Siddall et al, 2007b ; Laufer et al, 2008 ; Whitaker et al, 2014 ), it remains unknown whether or not the efficacy of leech therapy is dependent on the leech species used.…”
Section: The Medicinal Leechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each host species, the microbial community is dominated by Aeromonas and Bacteroidetes spp. ( Worthen et al, 2006 ; Siddall et al, 2007b , 2011 ; Laufer et al, 2008 ; Whitaker et al, 2014 ). In H. verbana , the predominant Bacteroidetes species was initially termed Rikenella- like and was recently renamed as Mucinivorans hirudinis , a member of the Rickenellaceae ( Worthen et al, 2006 ; Nelson et al, 2015b ).…”
Section: The Leech Crop Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Repair of primary and recurrent abdominal wall hernias with component separation and Strattice acellular dermal matrix is a technique where plastic surgeons and general surgeons work closely together to close abdominal walls and optimize functional as well as aesthetic outcomes reestablishing abdominal core health. [3,4] There are many different locations of hernias encountered by the general surgeon and plastic surgeon team: ventral, inguinal, umbilical, parastomal as well as the lateral abdominal wall ( ank). [5] Hernias are prevalent in the population and their presence is not inconsequential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%