2016
DOI: 10.1177/0272989x16636844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Patient-Centered Approach to Informed Consent

Abstract: Results suggest that providing concise informed consent content, systematically developed from patients' self-reported information needs, may be more effective at engaging and informing clinical trial participants than the traditional consent approach, without detriment to trial comprehension, risk assessment, or enrollment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No universal best practices for e-consent have emerged [ 56 , 57 ]. Moreover, although previous studies have compared different forms of consent [ 58 , 59 ], there is a lack of studies that empirically examine the consent process in the context of social media recruitment for clinical studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No universal best practices for e-consent have emerged [ 56 , 57 ]. Moreover, although previous studies have compared different forms of consent [ 58 , 59 ], there is a lack of studies that empirically examine the consent process in the context of social media recruitment for clinical studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Studies 1 and 2 use realistic field experiments conducted in a university research lab. Our results are therefore highly relevant for researchers and institutional review boards who are interested in ensuring that study participants provide informed consent (e.g., Krishnamurti & Argo, 2016). Outside of laboratory contexts, the results may underestimate the true effect of having another person present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Then, based on what was learned during recruitment for Cohort 2a (message length), which is detailed in the Method section, participants for Cohort 2b (message features) were randomly assigned to receive one of four messages: shortened versions of the three messages offering financial incentives or a shortened version of the message offering optional coaching. Shortening the messages allowed us to test the effects of message length, which may be important given research finding that simpler, more concise research materials have potential to increase patient engagement in clinical research (e.g., Krishnamurti & Argo, 2016). After receiving the recruitment message, patients could click on a hyperlink to visit the MindTrails website, enroll in the program, and complete the first session (out of five total sessions completed once per week).…”
Section: Overview Of Present Study and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examining patient recruitment for clinical trials point to other promotional messaging strategies that may be effective for increasing mental health service engagement. For example, research has found that patients are more likely to enroll in clinical trials when recruitment materials use concise (vs. lengthier) language (Krishnamurti & Argo, 2016; Murray et al, 2018), and when financial incentives are offered (Abdelazeem et al, 2022). These findings highlight the potential use of promotional messages, some of which can be implemented for virtually no cost (e.g., testimonials, concise language), to increase mental health service engagement.…”
Section: Overview Of Present Study and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%