2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-001-0388-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A patient-rated, surgeon-corrected scale for functional assessment after total anorectal reconstruction

Abstract: Although not validated, the patient-rated, surgeon-corrected adjustment of the WPASR system proved in our patients a reliable instrument for functional assessment. Its consensus administration to any given patient samples requires further research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is clear that colonic evacuation remains a significant problem in most reports of TPR [13,14,25]. In our series, the functional results were assessed using the modified version of the WPASR scoring system, a scoring scale of 0–20 dealing jointly with incontinence and constipation [5]. The overall median score after a median follow up of 40 months was 9.5, and the overall median score was 6 after a median follow up of 78 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, it is clear that colonic evacuation remains a significant problem in most reports of TPR [13,14,25]. In our series, the functional results were assessed using the modified version of the WPASR scoring system, a scoring scale of 0–20 dealing jointly with incontinence and constipation [5]. The overall median score after a median follow up of 40 months was 9.5, and the overall median score was 6 after a median follow up of 78 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality and morbidity (early; within 30 days of surgery, late; more than 30 days of surgery) and oncological outcome were recorded prospectively. Function was assessed after ileostomy closure using a modified version of the Working Party on Anal Sphincter Replacement (WPASR) scoring system; a 0-20 scoring scale accounting jointly for incontinence and constipation [5]. The questionnaire included assessment of continence for solid stools, liquid stools, gas and minor staining, and of difficulty of evacuation (straining for more than 30 min, incomplete or failed evacuation, use of enemas ⁄ irrigation ⁄ digital evacuation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 7-year follow-up, there was no evidence of tumour recurrence. Functional (3/20 on the modified version of the Working Party on Anal Sphincter Replacement (WPASR) scoring system [13]) and quality of life scores (75 on EORTC QLQ-C30-CR38 [14,15]) had been satisfactory. At presentation, however, the patient described increasing difficulty with intubation of her appendicostomy and complete reflux of the enema liquid.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La majorité des complications décrites pour cette technique se produisent durant la première année et peuvent être corrigées par un abord chirurgical local. Le résultat fonctionnel a été évalué à l'aide du modified version of the Working Party on Anal Sphincter Replacement (WPASR) scoring system [44]. Après un suivi de 78 mois, les huit patients ont un score médian WPASR de 6/20, correspondant à un bon résultat.…”
Section: Penninckx Et Al Et Portier Et Al Ont Décrit Leur Technique Deunclassified