A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundThis systematic review aimed to describe non-conveyance in ambulance care from patient-safety and ambulance professional perspectives. The review specifically focussed at describing (1) ambulance non-conveyance rates, (2) characteristics of non-conveyed patients, (3) follow-up care after non-conveyance, (4) existing guidelines or protocols, and (5) influencing factors during the non-conveyance decision making process.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and reference lists of included articles, in June 2016. We included all types of peer-reviewed designs on the five topics. Couples of two independent reviewers performed the selection process, the quality assessment, and data extraction.ResultsWe included 67 studies with low to moderate quality. Non-conveyance rates for general patient populations ranged from 3.7%–93.7%. Non-conveyed patients have a variety of initial complaints, common initial complaints are related to trauma and neurology. Furthermore, vulnerable patients groups as children and elderly are more represented in the non-conveyance population. Within 24 h–48 h after non-conveyance, 2.5%–6.1% of the patients have EMS representations, and 4.6–19.0% present themselves at the ED. Mortality rates vary from 0.2%–3.5% after 24 h, up to 0.3%–6.1% after 72 h. Criteria to guide non-conveyance decisions are vital signs, ingestion of drugs/alcohol, and level of consciousness. A limited amount of non-conveyance guidelines or protocols is available for general and specific patient populations. Factors influencing the non-conveyance decision are related to the professional (competencies, experience, intuition), the patient (health status, refusal, wishes and best interest), the healthcare system (access to general practitioner/other healthcare facilities/patient information), and supportive tools (online medical control, high risk card).ConclusionsNon-conveyance rates for general and specific patient populations vary. Patients in the non-conveyance population present themselves with a variety of initial complaints and conditions, common initial complaints or conditions are related to trauma and neurology. After non-conveyance, a proportion of patients re-enters the emergency healthcare system within 2 days. For ambulance professionals the non-conveyance decision-making process is complex and multifactorial. Competencies needed to perform non-conveyance are marginally described, and there is a limited amount of supportive tools is available for general and specific non-conveyance populations. This may compromise patient-safety.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-017-0409-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prehospital National Early Warning Score predicts early mortality

“…It could also aid in patient handovers from EMS to hospitals where a number of issues of transfer of both written and verbal information were noted in a recent review . Even though there is strong evidence that the speed of the initiation of the treatment is of vital importance for the therapeutic outcome, a significant proportion of the patients encountered by EMS are not transported at all . From patient safety and medicolegal perspective it would be reasonable to standardise the physiological evaluation of the patient, especially when EMS personnel are considering not transporting the patient.…”

A qualitative study on conveyance decision-making during emergency call outs to people with dementia: the HOMEWARD project

“…This, to some extent, reflects findings from other research concerning a more general patient population. A recent review by Ebben et al [24] found that factors influencing a non-conveyance decision are related to the professional's competence and experience, the patient's health status and best interest, the healthcare system and the availability of decision support.…”

Ambulance nurses' experiences of deciding a patient does not require ambulance care

“…Ambulance staff are looking for colleagues whom they feel confident in order to talk about their feelings (Ahl et al, 2005;Jonsson & Segesten, 2004;Svensson & Fridlund, 2008). Ambulance staff are constantly exposed to new situations where assessments and decisions have to be made; hence, there is an understanding of the collegial importance both practical and in terms of confidence (Ebben et al, 2017).…”