2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A patient with mosaic partial trisomy 18 resulting from dicentric chromosome breakage

Abstract: We present a patient with minor dysmorphic features and a mosaic karyotype with two different abnormal cell lines, both involving abnormalities of chromosome 18. Twenty percent of cells studied (4/20) had 46 chromosomes with a large derivative pseudoisodicentric chromosome 18. This chromosome was deleted for 18pter and duplicated for part of proximal 18p (18p11.2 based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies and all of 18q. The two copies of portions of chromosome 18 were fused in an inverted fash… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both mechanisms will result in a symmetrical isodicentric chromosome. If one of the isodicentric centromeres becomes nonfunctional (inactivated), the chromosome is referred to as being either isopseudodicentric (Madan et al, 1981) or pseudoisodicentric (Morrissette et al, 2005). We report a new type of asymmetrical pseudoisodicentric chromosome derived from non-isolocal sister chromatid breaks of a parental homolog.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Both mechanisms will result in a symmetrical isodicentric chromosome. If one of the isodicentric centromeres becomes nonfunctional (inactivated), the chromosome is referred to as being either isopseudodicentric (Madan et al, 1981) or pseudoisodicentric (Morrissette et al, 2005). We report a new type of asymmetrical pseudoisodicentric chromosome derived from non-isolocal sister chromatid breaks of a parental homolog.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Inverted duplications associated with terminal deletion (inv dup del) are complex rearrangements reported for an increasing number of chromosome ends [1p: Ballif et al, 2003; Tonk et al, 2005; 1q: Mewar et al, 1994; De Brasi et al, 2001; 2p: Aviram‐Goldring et al, 2000; Thangavelu et al, 2004; Gruchy et al, 2007; 2q: Bonaglia et al, 2000; 3p: Jenderny et al, 1998; Kennedy et al, 2000; 4p: Cotter et al, 2001; Kondoh et al, 2003; Beaujard et al, 2005; 4q: Van Buggenhout et al, 2004; 5p: Sreekantaiah et al, 1999; 7q: Stetten et al, 1997; 9p: Teebi et al, 1993; 10q: Hoo et al, 1995; 11p: Fisher et al, 2002; 14q: Chen et al, 2005; 15q: Genesio et al, 2004; 18p: Morrissette et al, 2005; 18q: Courtens et al, 1998; 21q: Pangalos et al, 1992; Xp: Milunsky et al, 1999; Dupont et al, 2007]. These rearrangements are more frequent than first thought based on banding techniques, as several cases were initially interpreted as terminal duplications [Bonaglia et al, 2000; De Brasi et al, 2001; Beaujard et al, 2005] or terminal deletions [Ballif et al, 2003].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial trisomy 18 has been reported extensively, but a pure form of partial trisomy 18 without involving other chromosomes is rare. Phenotypes of partial duplication of 18q resemble those of full trisomy 18 but are usually milder with longer life spans (Morrissette et al, 2005;Boghosian-Sell et al, 1994). On the other hand, partial deletions of chromosome 18, including deletion 18q, deletion 18p, ring 18, and other various forms, have an overall incidence of approximately 1 in 40,000 live births in humans (Feenstra et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%