1975
DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(75)90009-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pattern classification by dynamic tactile sense information processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work in tactile sensing for recognition tasks has emphasized traditional pattern recognition paradigms on arrays of sensor data, similar to early machine vision work (Kinoshita, Aida and Mori 1975;Hillis 1982;Ozaki et al 1982;Overton 1984). Most sensing has been static in that the sensor is larger than the object and a single touch or &dquo;handprint&dquo; is used for recognition.…”
Section: Tactile Sensingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous work in tactile sensing for recognition tasks has emphasized traditional pattern recognition paradigms on arrays of sensor data, similar to early machine vision work (Kinoshita, Aida and Mori 1975;Hillis 1982;Ozaki et al 1982;Overton 1984). Most sensing has been static in that the sensor is larger than the object and a single touch or &dquo;handprint&dquo; is used for recognition.…”
Section: Tactile Sensingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tactile sensors have been constructed using piezoelectric, piezoresistive, magneto-electric, capacitive, optical, and other technologies (Ueda et al 1972;Kinoshita 1975;Stojiljkovic and Clot 1977;Purbrick 1980;Schneiter 1982;Larcombe 1983;Rebman and Trull 1983;Boie 1984;Raibert 1984;Seigel et al 1987;Tise 1988;Speeter 1988). The most common variables transduced by these devices are or, or c, , the normal components of stress and strain.…”
Section: Receptor Responsementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The object surface was explored, and objects were classified by local curvature measurements. Kinoshita [1977;Kinoshita, Aida and Mohri 1975] demonstrated discrimination of circular, square and triangular cylin-ders based on the total number of sensing sites activated, using 384 binary sensors on a 5 finger hand. Hillis [1981] proposed to classify six small parts based on 3 ''features" j the shape (object long or round), bumps, and whether or not the part rolled with finger motion.…”
Section: Shape Interpretation Without Specific Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%