1976
DOI: 10.1080/11035897609454373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pattern of tectonic zones in the western part of the East European Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend is 10°-20 ° counterclockwise of the trend of topographic lineaments, which are seen by Landsat (Lindh 1980) and which parallel the Klaralven line, part of the regionally defined Protogine zone (Gorbatschev 1980). The left lateral offset in the zones of crustal ages (Stromberg 1976), which is also inferred from an offset in the aeromagnetic anomaly pattern (Riddihough 1972), is entirely consistent with the angularity of the present continental margin along the Jan Mayen fracture zone and apparently reflects the latter's inheritance of cratonic discontinuities. Riddihough (1972) similarly notes the coincidence in trend and continuity in the boundary between the Karalian and Svecofennian fold belts and the Senja fracture zone offnorthern Norway (Talwani & Eldholm 1977), implying similar tectonic inheritance.…”
Section: Inheritance and Rejuvenationsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trend is 10°-20 ° counterclockwise of the trend of topographic lineaments, which are seen by Landsat (Lindh 1980) and which parallel the Klaralven line, part of the regionally defined Protogine zone (Gorbatschev 1980). The left lateral offset in the zones of crustal ages (Stromberg 1976), which is also inferred from an offset in the aeromagnetic anomaly pattern (Riddihough 1972), is entirely consistent with the angularity of the present continental margin along the Jan Mayen fracture zone and apparently reflects the latter's inheritance of cratonic discontinuities. Riddihough (1972) similarly notes the coincidence in trend and continuity in the boundary between the Karalian and Svecofennian fold belts and the Senja fracture zone offnorthern Norway (Talwani & Eldholm 1977), implying similar tectonic inheritance.…”
Section: Inheritance and Rejuvenationsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Such a line would be a landward extrapolation of the trend of the Jan Mayen fracture zone NW of the Voring plateau and, according to the reconstruction by Talwani & Eldholm (1977), would have a landfall in Greenland between Kong Oscars Fjord and Gael Hankes Bay. Offsets are indeed recognizable as a change in the trend of the Greenland Caledonides and by contrasts within the Scandinavian Caledonides (Stromberg 1976) as discussed later.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The ages of the main geological units shown in Fig. 1, together with the different tectonic boundaries, are taken from Stromberg (1976). The different nappe boundaries are taken from the Geological map of Sweden (Magnusson et al 1958) and from Gustavson (1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ago (Eskola, 1963;Stromberg, 1976), and include eugeosynclinal counterparts of the miogeosynclinal Karelian quartzites (Kahma, 1973;Eskola, 1963) plus younger metasediments (Bowes, 1976). The…”
Section: Numbered Mineral Occurrences Refer To Localities Discussed Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Stromberg (1976Stromberg ( , 1978 and Kahma (1973) and as isolated synclinal inliers within the Archean craton (Ojakangas, 1965).…”
Section: Numbered Mineral Occurrences Refer To Localities Discussed Imentioning
confidence: 99%