1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(98)00037-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ‘Peak shaving’ approach to project staff reallocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kang et al (2011), based on interviews, identify individual-and team-level constraints influencing resource allocation in projects. Shaikh (1998) presented a model for project workforce reallocation with the objective of reducing chances of project overrun. In this regard, another study (Thakurta et al, 2009) also observed that a greater emphasis on managing the project human resource in projects that were considered endangered because of requirement volatility could lead to minimization of effort and schedule overrun.…”
Section: Human Resource Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kang et al (2011), based on interviews, identify individual-and team-level constraints influencing resource allocation in projects. Shaikh (1998) presented a model for project workforce reallocation with the objective of reducing chances of project overrun. In this regard, another study (Thakurta et al, 2009) also observed that a greater emphasis on managing the project human resource in projects that were considered endangered because of requirement volatility could lead to minimization of effort and schedule overrun.…”
Section: Human Resource Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has generally focused on the goals of increasing retention [1,28], building competitive advantage [4,33,41], operational performance [22,18,40], or coping with scarce IT labor resources [2,42]. Previous work has also addressed the impact of the manager's personnel selection decision on employee task assignments, and hence, on employee training and development opportunities [21].…”
Section: The It Development Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such projects, we should consider the time value of funds when studying on the resource leveling optimization problem, which accords more with construction practice and is of great significance for optimizing the allocation of resources and saving construction funds. As Shaikh M. A. and Talbot F. B. pointed out, construction progress optimization aims to make a reasonable schedule provided that the total construction duration is given, making the resource allocation balanced and dynamic investment minimum [1][2]. For large-scale projects, this point is more important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%