A peculiar reworking ofOphiomorphashafts in the Miocene Nangang Formation, Taiwan

Abstract

In the Miocene sandstones of the Nankang Formation in north-eastern Taiwan, different varieties of the trace fossil Ophiomorpha are abundant. In certain beds, a peculiar reworking of vertical Ophiomorpha shafts was observed. This reworking consists of an inner, lined tube positioned in the centre of the shaft. The shaft is lined by thin walls with small knobs and is distinctly different from the shafts of the Ophiomorpha nodosa mazes found in the same beds which have thick walls and large knobs. Because both outer and the inner tube walls were constructed by small sub-pellets, a diagenetic origin can be ruled out. The presence of sub-pellets further indicates that the inner tubes were also constructed by crustaceans and not commensal organisms such as worms or fish. The abundance of these vertical shafts suggests that they were constructed for a specific purpose, and the similarities in sub-pellets indicate that they likely were constructed by different generations of the same crustacean species. Because brooding chambers were not observed and are rare among extant marine crustaceans, we suggest that the vertical shafts were constructed to encourage juvenile shrimp to resettle in the parental burrows after they had completed their pelagic larval stages.

Sedimentary environment and benthic oxygenation history of the Upper Cretaceous Austin Chalk Group, south Texas: An integrated ichnological, sedimentological and geochemical approach

“…Robust decapod crustaceans are responsible for producing large burrows (roughly 20 mm wide), including Ophiomorpha isp., softground and firmground Thalassinoides isp., and Rhizocorallium isp. (Neto de Carvalho et al ., 2007; Löwemark et al ., 2016; Netto et al ., 2017). These dwelling structures (produced by suspension feeders, except for Rhizocorallium isp.)…”

The 20-million-year old lair of an ambush-predatory worm preserved in northeast Taiwan

“…There are multiple trace makers that can produce large, lined burrows like Pennichnus and the three most probable animal groups are infaunal shrimp; fast-burrowing, siphonated bivalves; and, large polychaetes. Shrimp are well known for constructing open burrow networks 38 , 39 and sometimes their burrows contain an inner tube potentially constructed by juvenile shrimp that re-occupy abandoned or infilled burrows 40 . However, shrimp burrow networks constructed in water-saturated sand typically comprise complicated shapes, like mazes or boxworks, and have turn-around chambers 41 , 42 .…”

Clasts derived from rhizocretions in shallow-marine Miocene clastic deposits of northern Hungary: an example of zombie structures

“…How ever, they can be a source of com ple men tary in forma tion on the palaeoenvironment. Other ex am ples of zom bie biogenic struc tures come from some trace fos sils, par tic u larly Ophiomorpha, frag ments of which can be re de pos ited as clasts (Löwemark et al, 2016;Pedrol de Freitas et al, 2020). Re de pos ited rhizocretions/rhizoliths are very rarely recorded in the lit er a ture.…”