2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2019.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pemphigus-like presentation of secondary syphilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syphilis testing should be offered to anyone presenting with a new papulosquamous rash or exanthem. Increasingly, nonpapulosquamous morphologies, including pustular, crusted or ecthymalike (so-called lues maligna), prurigo nodulelike, or targetoid morphologies, have been reported . Dermatologists should also be aware that ocular and neurosyphilis may present concurrently with PS syphilis.…”
Section: Clinical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syphilis testing should be offered to anyone presenting with a new papulosquamous rash or exanthem. Increasingly, nonpapulosquamous morphologies, including pustular, crusted or ecthymalike (so-called lues maligna), prurigo nodulelike, or targetoid morphologies, have been reported . Dermatologists should also be aware that ocular and neurosyphilis may present concurrently with PS syphilis.…”
Section: Clinical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been other reports of secondary syphilis mimicking pemphigus clinically 4 , 5 but, to our knowledge, this is the first case of secondary syphilis with positive DIF results for pemphigus vulgaris. Additionally, it is rare for syphilis to present with acantholysis, limited to few case reports in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In study by Kopelman et al . [ 29 ] the researchers showed that the skin lesions and dermatopathological analysis showed a pemphigus-like presentation of secondary syphilis. However, other related methods can help pathological studies to make a powerful decision in these patients, for example Müller et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%