2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.spasta.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A penalized quasi-maximum likelihood method for variable selection in the spatial autoregressive model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the following approaches: the conventional quantile regression method with instrument variables (RQ), the Fused LASSO method without adaptive weights (FL), the Fused Adaptive LASSO (FAL) method, the Fused Sup-norm method without adaptive weights (FS), and the Fused Adaptive Sup-norm (FAS) method. To evaluate various approaches, we examine the median of squared error (MedSE), that is the median of θ(k) − θ (k) 2 over 500 simulations, which has been used in Liu et. al.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the following approaches: the conventional quantile regression method with instrument variables (RQ), the Fused LASSO method without adaptive weights (FL), the Fused Adaptive LASSO (FAL) method, the Fused Sup-norm method without adaptive weights (FS), and the Fused Adaptive Sup-norm (FAS) method. To evaluate various approaches, we examine the median of squared error (MedSE), that is the median of θ(k) − θ (k) 2 over 500 simulations, which has been used in Liu et. al.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, Liu et al [18] investigated variable selection in the SAR model with independent and identically distributed errors, but their model was not under the situation of a diverging number of parameters and the asymptotic properties they established were not available for high-dimensional data. Xie et al [19] considered the penalized estimation for SAR models with a diverging number of parameters and established the oracle properties; however, their method was available for high-dimensional crosssectional data but not for panel data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Piribauer et al (2016) [ 13 ] proposed a Bayesian variable selection procedure in a spatial autoregressive model. A penalized quasi-maximum likelihood method was put forth by Liu et al (2018) [ 14 ] for variable selection in the spatial autoregressive model. Model selection in spatial autoregressive models with varying coefficients was studied by Wei et al (2019) [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%