A Perceptual Approach for Investigating Urban Space Diversity in the City of Doha

Abstract

The city of Doha is growing rapidly with emerging urban nodes and centers, housing development. Little attention however has been paid to several growth aspects including the understanding of urban space diversity and the resulting inhabitants' spatial experience, their attitudes toward emerging urbanized spaces. Utilizing a perceptual approach in the form of an attitude survey, this paper explores urban spaces in the city of Doha as perceived and experienced by different groups. An investigation of a number of key urban spaces is undertaken through the identification of key urban nodes that are identified based on parameters that include density, commercial activity, and public accessibility. Spaces are examined from the perspective of Doha's inhabitants using 490 responses to a survey questionnaire. The results delineate that urban spaces lack key conditions amenable to creating urban diversity. Nevertheless, they corroborate the postulation that urban spaces are perceived and experienced differently by different groups based on their gender, age, and cultural background. The paper concludes with suggestions toward a more inclusive approach to the design of the city's urban spaces.

Toward A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Urban Open Spaces

“…And their attraction to them. Attributes such as attractiveness, size, and distance are strongly associated with the walking concept (Salama & Azzali, 2015;Salama & Gharib, 2012;Subramanian & Jana, 2018a, 2018bWeijs-Perrée et al, 2020). The indicators of attractiveness and productivity of these spaces were rated regarding characteristics such as distinctiveness, accessibility, safety, comfort, diversity, flexibility, and interactivity (Faragallah, 2018;Phan et al, 2020).…”

“…Previous studies have investigated the efficiency of urban spaces regarding three important growth attributes -functional, social, and perceptual - (Salama & Azzali, 2015;Salama & Gharib, 2012;Salama, Khalfani, & Al-Maimani, 2013). As the importance of the relationship between the spatial environment and the social one in urban open spaces grows (Zaleckis et al, 2017), the interest in social value has recently increased in urban studies (Jalaladdini & Oktay, 2012;Salama & Azzali, 2015).…”

Polyphonic narratives for built environment research

“…With their socio-physical, socio-economic, socio-cultural and socio-political presence cities have always been highly differentiated places manifesting heterogeneity, diversity of activities, entertainment, excitement and pleasure. They produce, reproduce, represent and convey much of what counts today as culture, knowledge and politics (Al-Maimani et al , 2014; Salama and Gharib, 2012). Urban spaces within cities are no exception; they are places for the pursuit of freedom, not only un-oppressed activities and desires but also ones characterised by systematic power, oppression, domination, exclusion and segregation.…”

Social Production and Consumption of Space: Study of Public-Market in Bandung, Indonesia

“…In conventional architectural term, "space" is recognized as a void defined by solid forms (Ching, 2007), and "place" gets higher understanding: space with specific meanings and character (Trancik, 1986). By concept of place-making, architecture can contribute to create various atmosphere for richness human experiences, identity production, and cultural diversity of spaces (Schneekloth & Shibley, 2000;Salama & Gharib, 2012;Marcuse, 2014;van Klyton, 2015;Savić, 2017). The concept of place then develops in phenomenological (Norberg-Schultz, 1991;Sharr, 2007), psychometrics (Patterson & Williams, 2005), and social constructivism approaches (Ekomadyo et al, 2018a;Morgan, 2010;Sudradjat, 2012).…”