2012
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2012.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Perceptual-Statistics Shading Model

Abstract: This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Abstract-The process of surface perception is complex and based on several influencing factors, e.g., shading, silhouettes, occluding contours, and top down cognition. The accuracy of surface perception can be measured and the influencing factors can be modified in order to decrease the error in perception. This paper presents a novel concept of how a perceptual evaluation of a visualizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some of the previous evaluations of the depth perception of volume rendered images have been conducted with a special domain focus [Ropinski et al 2006;Kersten-Oertel et al 2014], our study keeps the domain open, and thus does not make implications about the nature of the used data sets. Apart from these depth perception evaluations, several authors have presented studies in which they have investigated shape perception, e. g., [Baer et al 2011;Solteszova et al 2012]. Interrante et al have for instance focused on the perception of surface shape, by determining how texturing affects the perception of nested semitransparent surfaces [1997].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of the previous evaluations of the depth perception of volume rendered images have been conducted with a special domain focus [Ropinski et al 2006;Kersten-Oertel et al 2014], our study keeps the domain open, and thus does not make implications about the nature of the used data sets. Apart from these depth perception evaluations, several authors have presented studies in which they have investigated shape perception, e. g., [Baer et al 2011;Solteszova et al 2012]. Interrante et al have for instance focused on the perception of surface shape, by determining how texturing affects the perception of nested semitransparent surfaces [1997].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify, which schemes an evaluation system should support, we have reviewed quantitative user evaluations earlier reported in the visualization literature. Based on this analysis we have decided to confine ourselves to evaluations which include static images only, as they have been described in Kosara's overview [27], and as they are facilitated in many recent publications about evaluations, for example, [31,45,18,17,3]. While not all publications describe the used questionnaires in all necessary detail, in most cases we were able to reconstruct the underlying scheme based on the result analysis.…”
Section: Trial Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, this correctness might be encoded in a pixel's color, either in the stimuli itself but mostly in one of the annotation layers. We found this especially useful for evaluations exploiting markers, were the distance to the camera [18], surface normals [45], or object size [31] have to be judged. In some occasions the correctness cannot be specified a priori or annotation layers are not available, for example when reusing stimuli from old user evaluations, then the correct value can be stored in the stimulus as a label.…”
Section: Response Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to bridge the gap between the findings made with respect to realism in VREs, and the impact of volume illumination models on task performance as reported in the visualization literature [21,39,40].…”
Section: Virtual Reality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%