2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.04176
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Performance Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Face Anti Spoofing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, CNN has achieved great breakthrough with the help of hardware development and data abundance. Recently, CNN is also widely used in face anti-spoofing tasks [21,23,14,12,19,25,35]. However, most of the deep learning methods simply consider face anti-spoofing as a binary classification problem with softmax loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since then, CNN has achieved great breakthrough with the help of hardware development and data abundance. Recently, CNN is also widely used in face anti-spoofing tasks [21,23,14,12,19,25,35]. However, most of the deep learning methods simply consider face anti-spoofing as a binary classification problem with softmax loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both [19] and [25] fine-tune a pre-trained VGG-face model and take it as a feature extractor for the subsequent classification. Nagpal et al [23] comprehensively study the influence of different network architectures and hyperparameters on face anti-spoofing. Feng [12] and Li [19] feed different kinds of face images into the CNN network to learn discriminative features on living faces and spoofing faces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, not only the research community but also the industry has recognized face anti-spoofing [18,19,4,33,39,11,23,55,1,29,12,49,45,54,21] as a critical role in securing the face recognition system. In the past few years, both traditional methods [14,42,9] and CNN-based methods [35,38,20,24,46] have shown effectiveness in discriminating between the living and spoofing face. They often formalize face anti-spoofing as a binary classification between spoofing and living images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%