2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijdmb.2018.095556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A performance evaluation of NoSQL databases to manage proteomics data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a part of NoSQL benchmarks, the multi-model database benchmark is listed separately due to the particularity of its data model. According to Messaoudi et al (2017Messaoudi et al ( , 2018, in biomedical big data, the authors selected a single multi-model database OrientDB and a polyglot persistence instance composed of MongoDB and Neo4j to carry out performance evaluation with multiple workloads, such as insertion, deletion, and search operations. The results showed that MongoDB performed better than OrientDB in processing document data, and OrientDB performed better than Neo4j in querying graph data when the depth of the graph reached three layers.…”
Section: Multi-model Database Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a part of NoSQL benchmarks, the multi-model database benchmark is listed separately due to the particularity of its data model. According to Messaoudi et al (2017Messaoudi et al ( , 2018, in biomedical big data, the authors selected a single multi-model database OrientDB and a polyglot persistence instance composed of MongoDB and Neo4j to carry out performance evaluation with multiple workloads, such as insertion, deletion, and search operations. The results showed that MongoDB performed better than OrientDB in processing document data, and OrientDB performed better than Neo4j in querying graph data when the depth of the graph reached three layers.…”
Section: Multi-model Database Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in using biomedical data is mainly due to the great heterogeneity of the data sources: querying them and exploiting the wealth of information they contain is a complex task full of obstacles. The problems that the researchers are required to face are mainly due to syntactic and semantic conflicts between data sources (Messaoudi, Fissoune, & Hassan, 2016). Syntactic conflicts are related to the diversity and multiplicity of models (structured, semi-structured, unstructured) and data formats.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis of existing systems and in accordance with (Messaoudi, Fissoune, & Hassan, 2016), the current approaches to biomedical data integration, like those described so far, can be broadly classified into three categories: data warehouse (i.e., databases that integrate a selected set of data into a common schema); linked data integration systems (i.e., based on the adoption of semantic web standards); workflow-based integration systems (i.e., integrating external data sources, based on a predefined pattern, to respond to a specific request).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%